Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 43(2): 61-67, Apr.-June 2023. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514429

ABSTRACT

Background: Many publications describe the advantages of the creation of ghost ileostomy (GI) to prevent the need for formal covering ileostomy in more than 80% of carcinoma rectum patients. However, none of the papers describes exactly how to ultimately remove the GI in these 80% of patients in whom it doesn't need formal maturation. Aim: To describe and evaluate the ghost ileostomy release down (GIRD) technique in terms of feasibility, complications, hospital stay, procedure time etc. in patients with low anterior resection/ultra-low anterior resection (LAR/uLAR) with GI for carcinoma rectum. Method: The present was a prospective cohort study of patients with restorative colorectal resections with GI for carcinoma rectum, Postoperatively the patients were studied with respect to ease and feasibility of the release down of GI and its complications. The data was collected, analyzed and inference drawn. Results: A total of 26 patients needed the GIRD and were included in the final statistical analysis of the study. The procedure was done between 7th to 16th postoperative days (POD) and was successful in all patients without the need of any additional surgical procedure. None of the patients required any local anesthetic injection or any extra analgesics. The average time taken for procedure was 5-minutes and none of the patients had any significant difficulty in GI release. There were no immediate postprocedure complications. Conclusion: The GIRD technique is a simple, safe, and quick procedure done around the 10th POD that can easily be performed by the bedside of patient without the need of any anesthesia or additional analgesics. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Ileum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Ileostomy/methods
2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-209665

ABSTRACT

Background:Gastric cancer accounts for many cancer-related deaths, is one of the top leading cause of cancer-associated mortality. Tumor staging and classification depends upon histological, immune histochemical tests along with the radiological imaging. In the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become principal attention in recent years.Aim:Evaluating the accuracy of MRI in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer vis-a-vis post-operative pathological staging Methods: A total of 37 patients were initially taken in our study, out of which 13 patients were excluded as they underwent neo adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for the down staging of the tumor. The 24 patients became the sample size of our study and their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T stage was correlated with pathological T-stage.Results:The diagnostic accuracy of T1stage by MRI was 87.5%, with 94.7% specificity and 60% sensitivity (n=24, κ -value = 0.58; P-value<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of T2stage by MRI was 87.5%, with 88.2% specificity and 85.7% sensitivity (n=24, κ-value= 0.69; P-value<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of T3stage by MRI was 91.7% with 93.3% specificity and 88.9% sensitivity (n=24, κ -value= 0.82; P-value<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of T4stage by MRI was 95.8%, with 100% specificity and 75% sensitivity (n=24, κ-value= 0.80; P-value<0.05).Conclusion:Because of high accuracy and specificity in determining the depth of invasion of gastric cancer, MRI proves to be an invaluable diagnostic tool in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer and therefore is very useful in sidestepping unnecessary surgery by supervising the selection of treatment decisions

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL