Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica ; (24): 3633-3638, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-689868

ABSTRACT

In this paper, on the contrast of healthy leech, the bacterial diversities were analyzed by 16S rDNA sequence analysis of the bacteria of muscle and intestinal tract of Whitmania pigra, the environment water and sediment of cultivating the diseased Wh. pigra in high temperature by high-throughput sequencing to determine the possible pathogenic bacteria of bacterial diseases of Leech in high temperature. The results showed that the original sequence reached over 83 000, and the effective sequences accounted for more than 87%. The GC contents ranged from 52% to 54% and the bacterial diversities were abundant. Bacterial relative abundance analysis showed that the bacterial content of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes was the most abundant in all treatments. Compared with healthy leech muscles and intestines, the muscle and intestinal tract of pathogenic leech relative abundance of Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, and Desulfovibrio was significantly increased, and it was abundant in water and sediment of diseased leeches, Lead to the possibility that the pathogenic bacteria of this bacterial disease may be Bacteroides, Pseudomonas, Desulfovibrio.

2.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 367-369, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-290783

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the impact of closed high-pressure suction drainage on the healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Patients undergoing rectal abdominoperineal resection in the Wuhan Tongji Hospital from January 2009 to January 2011 were randomized into two groups including the study group(n=61, closed high-pressure suction drainage) and the control group(n=59, presacral drainage). The drainage volume, primary healing rate, and the healing time of perineal wounds were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The total volume of the drainage in the first 3 days was (448.1±142.9) ml in the study group and (548.3±190.6) ml in the control group, the volume of the drainage on the third day was (28.1±12.7) ml and (125.9±84.3) ml respectively. The primary healing rate was 93.4%(57/61) in the study group and 74.6% (44/59) in the control group, the healing time was (13.5±3.5) days and (20.1±5.1) days respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Closed high-pressure suction drainage may promote perineal wound healing following rectal abdominoperineal resection.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Abdomen , General Surgery , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Perineum , General Surgery , Rectal Neoplasms , General Surgery , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL