Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine ; (12)2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-561980

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the relationship between angiotensin 1-converting enzyme(ACE)inserting/defaulting(I/D)gene polymorphisms and the carotid intima-media thickness(CCA-IMT)in patients with type 2 diabetes(T2DM).Methods The polymorphisms of ACE(I/D)was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism(PCR-RFLP)method and the CCA-IMT was assessed using non-invasive high resolution B-mode ultrasonography in 120 T2DM in Han's population of Dongguan city.The data were analyzed by Logistic regression to explore the independent and significant risk factors for CCA-IMT increase in type 2 diabetic patients.Results The DD genotype were significantly more common in diabetic patients with CCA-IMT increase than in those without it(F=10.164,P=0.006);Logistic regression analysis showed that DD genotype,age,male gender and essential hypertension contributed significantly to the CCA-IMT increase in type 2 diabetic patients(OR=3.689,1.054,1.562,respectively,P

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-556471

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical features of acute myocardial infarction in CAPD patients.MethodsCompare the clinical and laboratory data of 39 patients with CAPD and AMI for the first time (PD group),including clinical symptoms,signs,electrocardiogram changes,myocardial enzyme changes and in hospital mortality,with those of 50 patients without renal insufficient but with AMI for the first time (C group).Diagnosis of AMI was made in hospital.ResultsCompared to C group, the symptoms presented at first in PD group were more atypical and the patients went to see doctor more lately after AMI.Atypical electrocardiogram changes were more in PD group than in C group (61.5% vs 26.0%,P

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL