ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: Construir e implementar um instrumento (checklist) para melhoria do cuidado na manobra prona. Métodos: Estudo aplicativo, qualitativo e descritivo. O instrumento foi desenvolvido a partir de ampla revisão da literatura, para construção de um protocolo de atendimento assistencial, utilizando as principais bases eletrônicas (MEDLINE, LILACS e Cochrane). Resultados: Descrevemos a construção de uma ferramenta de segurança do paciente com suas inúmeras modificações e adaptações, a partir das observações da equipe multidisciplinar com seu uso na prática diária. Conclusão: A aplicação do checklist na manobra de prona acrescentou confiabilidade e segurança ao procedimento. O entendimento da importância da ferramenta na segurança do paciente, por parte da equipe, e sua capacitação são necessários para seu sucesso.
ABSTRACT Objective: To construct and implement an instrument (checklist) to improve safety when performing the prone maneuver. Methods: This was an applied, qualitative and descriptive study. The instrument was developed based on a broad review of the literature pertaining to the construction of a care protocol using the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, LILACS and Cochrane). Results: We describe the construction of a patient safety tool with numerous modifications and adaptations based on the observations of the multidisciplinary team regarding its use in daily practice. Conclusion: The use of the checklist when performing the prone maneuver increased the safety and reliability of the procedure. The team's understanding of the tool's importance to patient safety and training in its use are necessary for its success.
Subject(s)
Humans , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Prone Position , Patient Positioning/methods , Checklist , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Reproducibility of Results , Patient Positioning/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Introdução: A via radial é um acesso seguro para procedimentos percutâneos e reduz as complicações vasculares locais. Neste estudo comparou-se a evolução hospitalar de pacientes com infarto agudo do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMCSST) submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea primária (ICPp) por via radial vs. via femoral. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo com pacientes consecutivamente atendidos entre dezembro de 2009 e maio de 2011. Resultados: Foram incluídos 794 pacientes, 82 (10,3%) tratados por via radial e 712 (89,7%), por via femoral. Pacientes do grupo radial eram mais jovens (56,2 ± 10,7 anos vs. 61,2 ± 11,9 anos; P < 0,01), mais frequentemente do sexo masculino (78% vs. 68%; P = 0,06), com menor prevalência de diabetes (9,8% vs. 20%; P = 0,02) e maior fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (61,2 ± 11,8% vs. 55,5 ± 12,1%; P = 0,05). Não houve diferença em relação à maior parte das características angiográficas. Tromboaspiração (44% vs. 31%; P = 0,01) e administração de glicoproteína IIb/IIIa (41% vs. 26%; P = 0,004) foram mais utilizadas no grupo radial. O fluxo TIMI 3 final (93% vs. 88%; P = 0,47) e o blush miocárdico 3 (70% vs. 66%; P = 0,87) foram semelhantes entre os grupos. Não foram observadas diferenças em relação a óbito (7,5% vs. 8,4%; P = 0,78), reinfarto (4,9% vs. 4,4%; P = 0,77), revascularização de urgência (3,7% vs. 4,1%; P > 0,99), trombose do stent (2,4% vs. 3%; P > 0,99), sangramento maior (0 vs. 1,6%; P = 0,61) ou sangramento menor (5,3% vs. 7,3%; P = 0,81). Conclusões: A abordagem transradial mostrou-se segura e efetiva, com resultados semelhantes aos da abordagem transfemoral em pacientes com IAMCSST.
BACKGROUND: Radial access is a safe approach for percutaneous procedures and reduces local vascular complications. This study compared the hospital outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) using the radial vs. femoral approaches. METHODS: Prospective cohort study with consecutive patients treated between December 2009 and May 2011. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-four patients were included, 82 (10.3%) treated by radial access and 712 (89.7%) treated by femoral access. Radial access patients were younger (56.2 ± 10,7 years vs. 61,2 ± 11,9 years; P < 0.01), more often male (78% vs. 68%; P = 0.06), had a lower prevalence of diabetes (9.8% vs. 20%; P = 0.02) and higher left ventricle ejection fraction (61.2 ± 11.8% vs. 55.5 ± 12.1%; P = 0.05). There was no difference for most angiographic characteristics. Thromboaspiration (44% vs. 31%; P = 0.01) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa administration (41% vs. 26%; P = 0.004) were used more often in the radial group. The final TIMI 3 flow (93% vs. 88%; P = 0.47) and myocardial blush grade 3 (70% vs. 66%; P = 0.87) were similar between groups. There were no differences for death (7.5% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.78), reinfarction (4.9% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.77), emergency revascularization (3.7% vs. 4.1%; P > 0.99), stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 3%; P > 0.99), major bleeding (0 vs. 1.6%; P = 0.61) or minor bleeding (5.3% vs. 7.3%; P = 0.81) rates. CONCLUSIONS: The transradial approach has proven to be safe and effective with similar results to transfemoral approach in patients with STEMI.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Angioplasty/methods , Angioplasty , Femoral Artery/surgery , Radial Artery/surgery , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Electrocardiography/methods , Electrocardiography , Prospective Studies , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A reestenose clínica após o implante de stent coronário costuma ser tratada com revascularização da lesão-alvo (RLA). Nosso objetivo foi relatar o perfil clínico e os desfechos de pacientes com reestenose intrastent (RIS) sintomática que não foram submetidos a nova RLA. Métodos: Identificamos pacientes que presentaram reestenose clínica após colocação de stent coronário entre janeiro de 1997 e dezembro de 2001. As características clínicas e angiográficas e os desfechos clínicos dos pacientes que não passaram por nova revascularização (grupo sem RLA) foram comparados aos de pacientes revasclarizados (grupo com RLA). Todos os pacientes tiveram acompanhamento de pelo menos dois anos após implante do stent para ocorrência de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores (ECAM). Resultados:No período do estudo, 1.221 stents foram implantados em 1.149 pacientes. Observou-se RIS em 135 pacientes (12 por cento) dos quais 104 tiveram acompanhamento clínico e angiográfico completo, 23 no grupo sem RLA e 81 no grupo vom RLA. O período médio de acompanhamento após a colocação de stent coronário foi de 30,8 +- 7,5 meses. Pacientes do grupo sem RLA tiveram porcentual significativamente mais alto de doença...
BACKGROUND: Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting is generally treated by target vessel revascularization (TVR). This study was aimed at reporting the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) who were not submitted to a TVR. METHOD: Patients who presented clinical restenosis after coronary stenting between January 1997 and December 2001 were identified. Clinical and angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who did not undergo a new revascularization (no-TVR group) were compared with revascularized patients (TVR group). All of the patients had at least 2 years of follow-up for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after stent implantation. RESULTS: In the study period, 1,221 stents were implanted in 1,149 patients. ISR was observed in 135 patients (12%), of which 104 had complete clinical and angiographic follow-up, 23 in the no-TVR group and 81 in the TVR group. The mean follow-up period after coronary stenting was 30.8 ± 7.5 months. Patients in the no-TVR group had a significantly higher percent of one vessel disease (82% vs. 47%; P < 0.01). Patients in the no-TVR group had a long-term MACE rate of 21.7% (5 patients: 2 deaths, 3 myocardial infarctions), whereas those submitted to a new revascularization showed a subsequent MACE rate of 9.8% (8 patients: 1 death, 4 myocardial infarctions, 3 coronary artery bypass graft surgery; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Patients with clinical ISR not treated with a TVR more frequently presented one-vessel disease and a trend towards higher incidence of MACE when compared to those treated with a new TVR.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Angioplasty/methods , Angioplasty , Coronary Restenosis/complications , Coronary Restenosis/diagnosis , StentsABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: Estudos demonstram que as angioplastias primárias realizadas fora do horário de rotina estão relacionadas a pior prognóstico. É objetivo deste estudo avaliar os desfechos das angioplastias primárias realizadas dentro e fora do horário de rotina de serviço de hemodinâmiva. Método: Estudo de coorte prospectivo, incluindo 112 pacientes consecutivamente atendidos por infarto agudo do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAM) entre dezembro de 2009 e janeiro de 2010. Características clínicas e angiográficas e evolução hospitalar foram registradas em banco de dados específicos. Houve dois grupos para comparação: grupo A, IAM tratado entre as 20 horas e as 8 horas e B, IAM tratado entre as 8 horas e as 20 horas. Resultados: A amostra inclui 44 pacientes no grupo A e 68 no grupo B. As características basais foram semelhantes em ambos os grupos. O tempo porta-balão foi significativamente maior no grupo A (133 minutos vs. 90 minutos; P < 0,001). No entanto, não houve diferença significante entre os grupos A e B...
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that off-hours primary percutaneous coronary intervention is related to worse prognosis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of normal and off-hours primary percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: A prospective observational study including 112 consecutive patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) was conducted from December 2009 to January 2010. Clinical and angiographic characteristics and in-hospital follow up were registered in a specific database. There were two groups for comparison: group A, MI treated between 8 pm and 8 am and group B, MI treated between 8 am and 8 pm. RESULTS: The sample included 44 patients in group A and 68 in group B. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Door-to-balloon time was significantly longer in group A (133 minutes vs. 90 minutes; P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between groups A and B regarding mortality (13.7% vs. 5.9%; P = 0.28), reinfarction (6.8% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.90), progression to cardiogenic shock (11.4% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.30), stent thrombosis (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.33), or major bleeding (2.3% vs. 1.5%; P > 0.99). The only predictor of combined in-hospital outcome was heart rate at admission (odds ratio 1.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MI have similar in-hospital clinical outcomes during normal and off-hours primary percutaneous coronary intervention. However, door-to-balloon time is significantly longer during off-hours procedures.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Angioplasty/methods , Angioplasty , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Reperfusion/methods , Myocardial ReperfusionABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: Há grande interesse científico com relação ao status socioeconômico e à saúde populacional, e vários estudos demostraram influência dessas variáveis na evolução clínica dos pacientes. A presente análise avalia a influência da renda do indivíduo na distribuição dos fatores de risco e nas características clínicas e angiográficas em pacientes submetidos a angiografia percutânea. Método: Os pacientes submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea em um centro terciário, entre dezembro de 2007 e março de 2008, foram incluídos prespectivamente. A informação relativa à renda foi coletada diretamente com o paciente por um dos pesquisadores do estudo. Na presente análise, os indivíduos foram divididos em quartis, de acordo com seus respectivos rendimentos mensais. Resultados: Foram incluídos 400 pacientes com média de idade de 61,6...
BACKGROUND: There is great scientific interest with respect to socioeconomic status and population health, and several studies have shown the influence of these variables on clinical outcome of patients. The present study assesses the influence of income on the distribution of risk factors, clinical and angiographic characteristics in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHOD: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a tertiary center from December 2007 to March 2008 were prospectively included. The information on income was directly collected from the patient by one of the investigators. In this analysis, subjects were divided into quartiles according to their respective monthly income. RESULTS: Four hundred patients with mean age of 61.01 ± 10.36 years, 64.7% males and 24.6% diabetics were included. A majority had stable angina (54.9%), and there were no differences between groups regarding comorbidities. Income was associated with the percentage of male patients (48% in the first quartile vs. 81.3% in the last quartile; P < 0.001), the weight and height (P < 0.05), but there was no association with mean body mass index. We also observed a significant association between income and use of drug-eluting stents with the following rates from first to fourth quartile: 0, 1%, 1.9% and 7.7% (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In this study, there was an association between income and gender, anthropometric characteristics and use of drug-eluting stents. There was no association between income and risk factors, medical history and angiographic characteristics of patients.