ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus on the effect of different dressings in the healing of donor site, and few studies have directly compared the healing effect of different dressings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the healing effect of five different dressings on donor site wounds by network meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials about different dressings in the treatment of donor site wounds were retrieved by computer in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Chinese Academic Journal Full Text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database, WanFang Data Platform and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database. The retrieval time limit was from inception until May 2018. Literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction were conducted independently by two postgraduates. Winbugs 1.4.3 and Stata 13.0 softwares were used for data analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included. In the observation group, foam dressing, hydrocolloid dressing, alginate dressing or silver dressing was used. In the control group, vaseline gauze was used. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the healing time of donor sites for alginate dressing, silver dressing, hydrocolloid dressing and foam dressing was significantly shorter than that of vaseline gauze (P < 0.05) , but there was no difference in wound healing time between foam dressing, hydrocolloid dressing, alginate dressing and silver dressing at the donor site (P> 0.05) . The healing effects of different dressings were ranked as follows (from good to bad) : alginate dressing, silver dressing, hydrocolloid dressing, foam dressing and vaseline gauze. Overall findings indicate that alginate dressing may be the best choice to shorten the healing time of donor site, and further investigations are warranted.