ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) for the treatment of esophageal varices.Methods:From June 2019 to November 2020, cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who received endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group. The number of treatments to eradicate varicose veins, the dose of sclerosing agent used in the first treatment, the number of injection points in the first treatment, the rebleeding rate within 10 months after the operation and the incidence of complications or adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:Ninety-two cases were initially included in the study, and 7 cases were excluded based on exclusion criteria. Finally, 85 cases were included in the data analysis, 47 in the bc-EIS group and 38 in the traditional EIS group. The first eradication rate, the second cumulative eradication rate and the third cumulative eradication rate were 82.98% (39/47), 91.49% (43/47) and 100.00% (47/47) in the bc-EIS group, and they were 10.53% (4/38) ( χ 2=44.125, P<0.001), 31.58% (12/38) ( χ 2=33.023, P<0.001) and 63.16% (24/38) ( χ 2=20.730, P<0.001), respectively in the traditional EIS group, and the differences were statistically significant. The treatment times of eradicating varicose veins in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group were 1.25±0.60 and 3.21±1.41, respectively, with significant difference. The dosage of sclerosing agent in first treatment in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group was 17.66±7.14 mL and 22.92±6.84 mL, respectively ( t=3.441, P=0.001). The numbers of initial injection points in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group were 2.70±0.86 and 2.78±1.04, respectively and the difference was not statistically significant ( t=1.847, P=0.065). The rebleeding rates of the two groups within 10 months after the operation were 2.13% (1/47) and 18.42% (7/38) respectively ( χ 2=4.771, P=0.029). There were no serious complications in the two groups. The incidences of retrosternal pain, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension and ulcer were 2.13% (1/47), 2.13% (1/47), 4.26% (2/47) and 0.00% (0/47) in the bc-EIS group, and in the traditional EIS group, they were 5.26% (2/38) ( χ 2=0.035, P=0.851), 5.26% (2/38) ( χ 2=0.035, P=0.851), 7.89% (3/38) ( χ 2=0.060, P=0.806) and 7.89% (3/38) ( χ 2=1.877, P=0.171), respectively, without significant difference. Conclusion:Bc-EIS is more effective than traditional EIS for the treatment of esophageal varices with lower postoperative rebleeding rate, which shows better clinical application value.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) for esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.Methods:From December 2020 to April 2021, cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who planned to receive endoscopic treatment in the Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected and randomly divided into the trial group (treated with bc-EIS) and the control group [treated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL)] through computer randomization. The varices eradication rate, rebleeding rate and postoperative adverse reactions in the two groups were studied.Results:During the study, 93 cases were initially included according to inclusion criteria, among which 9 cases were excluded by exclusion criteria. Finally, 84 cases were included for data analysis, with 42 cases in each group. The esophageal varices eradication rate after the first treatment in the trial group was 88.10% (37/42), which was significantly higher than that in the control group [33.33% (14/42)] ( χ2=26.40, P<0.001). The esophageal varices eradication rate after 1 to 2 times and 1 to 3 times of treatment in the trial group were both significantly higher than those in the control group [97.62% (41/42) VS 40.48% (17/42), χ2=29.47, P<0.001; 100.00% (42/42) VS 45.24% (19/42), P<0.001]. The maximum follow-up period was 6 months, and none of the patients had rebleeding in the trial group, and the rebleeding rate in the control group was 4.76% (2/42) ( P=0.494). The incidence of thoracic and abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting, and abdominal distension in the trial group and control group were 26.19% (11/42) and 35.71% (15/42) ( χ2=0.51, P=0.474), 2.38% (1/42) and 7.14% (3/42) ( χ2=0.26, P=0.608), and 4.76% (2/42) and 11.90% (5/42) ( χ2=0.62, P=0.430), respectively. No other adverse events such as infection, dysphagia, perforation, esophageal tracheal fistula, esophageal stenosis, or ectopic embolism occurred in any group. Conclusion:Bc-EIS is effective and safe for the treatment of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis, with a one-time varices eradication rate of more than 85%, and can be completely eradicated after 1 to 3 times of treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of inflatable balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) in the treatment of esophago-gastric fundal varices (EGV).Methods:From June 12 to September 12, 2020, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 38 patients with EGV who underwent bc-EIS were prospectively selected, the amount and the injection points of sclerosing medication were calculated, whether the injection point was bleeding during operation (no bleeding, oozing, spurting), whether compression was needed to stop bleeding (no need, needle sheath compression to stop bleeding, transparent cap compression to stop bleeding), early rebleeding after operation (72 h to 6 weeks after operation), delayed bleeding (six weeks after operation) were observed, and the number of treatments to achieve the complete elimination of varices were recorded. The postoperative follow-up period was one, three and six months to evaluate the efficacy and complications of bc-EIS. Descriptive methods were used for statistical analysis.Results:Among the 38 patients with EGV, there were 24 males and 14 females, aged (53.2±11.3) years old (ranged from 30 to 79 years old). During bc-EIS operation, the dosage of sclerosing medication of each patient was (20.03 ±7.49) mL (ranged from 6 to 40 mL), and the injection points of sclerosing medication were 4.97±1.83 (ranged from 2 to 10). The rates of complete disappearance of varices after the first, second and third time of bc-EIS were 71.1% (27/38), 89.5% (34/38) and 100.0% (38/38), respectively. Among the 38 patients with EGV, no postoperation varices related rebleeding occurred. During the follow-up two patients had hematemesis and melena within one month after operation. The endoscopic diagnosis was gastric varices bleeding below the cardia, which was improved after tissue glue injection under endoscopy. No severe adverse reactions such as fever, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, ectopic embolism, or death occurred in all patients after bc-EIS treatment.Conclusions:The dosage of sclerosing medication in bc-EIS is reduced by half compared with the recommended amount in the guidelines, and the injection point bleeding is less, moreover, the rate of complete disappearance rate of esophageal varices is more than 70% after the first treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the risks and benefits of endoscopic ligation and tissue adhesive injection for tortuous gastric varices.Methods:A total of 193 patients with esophagogastric varices, who underwent endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2015 to June 2020, were included in the retrospective analysis. These cases were connected vessels (type Le and gf based on LDRf standard) of tortuous gastric varices (F1 in Hashizume standard). According to the treatment, the patients were divided into three groups: gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, 32 cases), tissue adhesive group (endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices, endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 71 cases) and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 90 cases). The re-bleeding rate, the effectiveness rate, the significant effectiveness rate and complications of the three groups were compared.Results:The rates of re-bleeding in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 12.68% (9/71) and 3.33% (3/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=6.110, P<0.016). The effectiveness rates of the three groups were all 100.00%. The significant effectiveness rates in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 37.50% (12/32), 25.35% (18/71) and 14.44% (13/90), respectively. There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=7.702, P<0.016). No pulmonary infection, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or perforation occurred in the three groups.The incidences of chest pain or abdominal pain in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 11.27% (8/71) and 2.22% (2/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=10.524, P<0.016). There was no significant difference in the incidence of fever, nausea or vomiting among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Simultaneous endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, and endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices combined with endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices is of no benefit for patients with tortuous gastric varices, but endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices alone may yield more benefit.