Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block for Acute Cervical Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical outcomes of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided selective nerve root block (SNRB) for severe arm pain caused by acute cervical disc herniation. METHODS: The authors analyzed the data obtained from 25 consecutive patients who underwent CT fluoroscopy-guided SNRB for severe arm pain, i.e., a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 8 points or more, caused by acute soft cervical disc herniation. Patients with chronic arm pain, motor weakness, and/or hard disc herniation were excluded. RESULTS: The series comprised 19 men and 6 women whose mean age was 48.1 years (range 35-72 years). The mean symptom duration was 17.5 days (range 4-56 days) and the treated level was at C5-6 in 13 patients, C6-7 in 9, and both C5-6 and C6-7 in 3. Twenty-three patients underwent SNRB in 1 session and 2 underwent the procedure in 2 sessions. No complications related to the procedures occurred. At a mean follow-up duration of 11.5 months (range 6-22 months), the mean VAS score and NDI significantly improved from 9 and 58.2 to 3.4 and 28.1, respectively. Eighteen out of 25 patients (72%) showed successful clinical results. Seven patients (28%) did not improve after the procedure, and 5 of these 7 underwent subsequent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy-guided SNRB may play a role as a primary conservative treatment for severe arm pain caused by acute cervical disc herniation.

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Laser Lumbar Discectomy / 대한통증학회지

BACKGROUND: Over the years, disc surgery has progressively evolved in the direction of decreasing trauma and its invasiveness. Conventional open surgery has many complications, such as scarring, instability, bleeding and a relative high mortality rate. Minimally invasive spinal surgery is now an alternative to a traditional discectomy. Herein, we present an operative technique, and the early results, for a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in herniated lumbar disc disease. METHODS: 43 patients, including 27 men and 16 women, with ages ranging from 18 to 66 years, were enrolled in this study. All the patients showed a protruded or extruded soft disc herniation at the lumbar level on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. A percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy was applied to the patients, and clinical responses evaluated using MacNab's criteria. RESULTS: 40 patients were regarded as showing successful responses (93.1%), and there were no severe complications, such as a hematoma, nerve injury, postoperative dysesthesia or death. One patient underwent fusion surgery for remnant back pain six month later. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in properly selected patients, a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a safe, noninvasive and effective treatment modality for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc disease.

Effect of Greater Occipital Nerve Block on the Posterior Headache and Neck Pain after Total Thyroidectomy / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: During thyroidectomy, the patient's neck is fully extended for good surgical exposure. After thyroidectomy, patients usually complain of posterior headache and posterior neck pain. It has been known that the greater occipital nerve block is a means of effective medical treatment for occipital headache and posterior neck pain. Therefore, we examined the effects of a greater occipital nerve block on postthyroidectomy headache and neck pain. METHODS: This study was randomized and double-blinded. After anesthesia induction, patients were administered greater occipital nerve block by the same anesthesiologist; 0.25% bupivacaine 5 ml was used for each greater occipital nerve block. Patients in the control group did not receive a greater occipital nerve block. After thyroidectomy, another anesthesiologist evaluated patients' headaches and neck pains at 4, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by using a VAS. RESULTS: Forty four patients were included. The number of patients in the control and the block group were 27 and 17, respectively. VAS scores of occipital headache after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the control group were 3.52+/-2.75, 3.67+/-2.75, and 2.95+/-1.96, respectively. VAS scores of occipital headache after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the block group were 0.05+/-0.65, 0.50+/-0.85, and 0.43+/-0.64, respectively. VAS scores of posterior neck pain after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the control group were 4.09+/-2.79, 3.81+/-2.60, and 3.00+/-2.02. VAS scores of posterior neck pain after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the block group were 1.29+/-2.20, 1.00+/-1.66, and 0.79+/-1.25, respectively. The pain experienced by the block group was significantly lower than that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that greater occipital nerve block is an effective modality for reducing post-thyroidectomy headache and posterior neck pain.

A Clinical Study of Splanchnic Nerve Block / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to manage intractable pain from advanced carcinoma of the upper abdomen. One method used to control pain associated with these malignancies is to block the splanchnic nerve. We investigated that VAS (visual analogue scale) difference before and after splanchnic nerve block (SNB) and pain relief day. Also we studied relationship between VAS before SNB and pain relief day. METHODS: A rewiew of 70 patients who took splanchnic nerve block (SNB) from September 1994 to February 1998 was carried out to assess age, sex, primary diseases, pain sites, VAS before and after SNB, date of diagnosis, date of SNB, date of death and pain relief day, etc. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 44 were males and the remaining 26 were females. The causes of pain were stomach cancer 28 (40%), pancreatic cancer 18 (25%), gall bladder cancer 7 (10%), hepatoma 6 (8.6%) respcectively. Average day from diagnosis to SNB was 272 and average day from diagnosis to death was 341. So, patients died on the average 69 days after they took the splanchnic nerve block in pain clinic. VAS average before SNB was 8.01 and VAS average after SNB was 3.64. Patients felt pain relief during 35 days after SNB. Pain relief day of patients who had lower VAS before SNB was longer than that of patients who had higher VAS before SNB. CONCLUSION: Early application of splanchnic nerve block will make the patients endure the cancer pain more easily.

Postoperative Analgesia with Meperidine in Cesarean Section Patients / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Perioperative noxious stimuli and inflammation may induce peripheral and central sensitization. Together, these changes contribute to the state of postinjury pain hypersensitivity found postoperatively. Preemptive analgesia may prevent nociceptive inputs generated during surgery from sensitizing central neurones and may therefore, reduce postoperative pain. We studied whether or not intravenous meperidine infusion before induction could affect postoperative pain and analgesic consumption when compared with intravenous meperidine infusion at peritoneum closure. METHODS: Female patients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to one of two groups for prospective study. Group I (n=10) received intravenous meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) 5 minutes before induction of anesthesia and group II (n=10) received the same treatment at peritoneal closure. Both groups had a continuous infusion of meperidine (5 mg/hr) immediately after intravenous bolus meperidine. Postoperative pain relief was provided with intravenous meperidine from a PCA system (Walkmed , Medex, USA). Postoperative visual analogue pain scores (VAS), meperidine consumption and side effects were examined and compared between the groups for two postoperative days. RESULTS: At two hours post surgery VAS at rest were below 3 in both groups and were not statistically significant. VAS on motion were slightly higher than VAS at rest in both groups and were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in meperidine consumption. There were minor side effects such as nausea, somnolence, dizziness and pruritus, but no patients needed any treatment and all of them were satisfied. CONCLUSION: Preemptive or postincisional intravenous PCA with meperidine was equally effective for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section, with minor side effects. These results suggested that there was no reason for applying preemptive analgesia for cesarean section patients. Further studies will be needed to evaluate preemptive effects of intravenous meperidine or other analgesics in cesarean section patients.