ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole sodium for injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.Methods It was designed as a multi-center,stratified randomized,double-blind,positive drug parallel controlled and non-inferiority study.From October 2014 to April 2015,at 40 hospitals,patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage confirmed by gastroendoscopy were enrolled and divided into the ilaprazde sodium group (10 mg ilaprazole sodium for injection every 24 h,the first dose doubled) and the positive control group (40 mg of omeprazole sodium for injection every 12 h).The course of both treatment was 72 h.The hemostasis rate of overall group at 72 h,the clinical rebleeding rate at four to seven days,the blood transfusion rate,the incidence of switching to other treatments and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.A chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability method were performed for statistical analysis.Results A total of 533 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled,355 patients in the ilaprazole sodium group and 178 patients in the positive control group.The hemostasis rates of ilaprazole sodium group and positive control group at 72 h were 97.69 ％ (339/347) and 97.14 ％ (170/175),respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05).There were no rebleeding patients in both groups at four to seven days.The blood transfusion rates of ilaprazole sodium group and positive control group were 5.07 ％ (18/355) and 3.37 ％ (6/178).The incidence of switching to other treatments was 0.56％ (2/355) and 0.56％ (1/178),respectively,and the differences were not statistically significant (both P＞ 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the ilaprazole sodium group was 3.94％ (14/355),which was lower than that of positive control group (8.43％,15/178).And the difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact probability method,P=0.042).Conclusions The efficacy of ilaprazole sodium for injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding is similar to that of omeprazole sodium for injection.Moreover,the smaller the dose,the lower the frequency of administration and the better the safety.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of ilaprazole enteric tablets on intragastric pH in duodenal ulcer patients. Methods A randomized, double blind, positive controlled clinical trial was carried out. A total of forty-two patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized into low dose ilaprazole group (5 mg/d), medium dose ilaprazole group (10 mg/d), high dose ilaprazole group(20 mg/d) and omeprazole group(20 mg/d). An ambulatory 24 hour intragastric pH study was performed at the fifth treatment day. Fraction time pH above 3, 4 or 5, median values of 24 hour diurnal pH and 12 hour nocturnal pH, the percentage of patients with total time pH above 3, 4 or 5 at least for 18 hours were evaluated. Results There were no significant differences of fraction time pH above 3 or 4, median values of 24 hour diurnal pH and 12 hour nocturnal pH and the percentage of patients with total time pH above 3, 4 or 5 at least for 18 hours among all the groups with different doses of ilaprazole and the omeprazole group. The fraction time pH above 5 in medium and high dose ilaprazole groups were (87.96 ± 12. 29)% and (89.86±15. 18)% respectively, which was higher than that in low dose ilaprazole group [(67. 17± 30. 16)%] and omeprazole group[(76. 14 ± 16. 75)%], P <0. 05. Conclusion Ilaprazole has a strong effect on intragastric acid control with a dose dependent trend.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two kinds of dosage of 5-aminosalicylic acid zinc enteric-coated capsule in treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods The muhicentre, double blind, dosage reaction and contrast trial was conducted in six hospitals during March 2004 to Sep. 2004. One hundred and eight patients with UC were randomly allocated into the high dosage (n= 36, 1 g, bid) and the low dosage (n = 36, 0.5 g, bid) of 5-aminosalicylic acid zinc enteric-coated capsule groups, and the Olsalazine sodium group (n = 36, 1 g, tid) with a 8-week treatment. The efficacy and adverse events of 5-aminosalicylic acid zinc enteric-coated capsule were evaluated based on the clinical presentations and endoscopic findings. Results The clinical efficacy was 68.97% in high dosage group, 45. 45% in low dosage group and 62.86% in Olsalazine sodium group with no significant difference (P>0. 05). The endoscopic examination showed that the healing rate of UC in high dosage group and low dosage group was 51.72% and 21.21%, respectively, whereas the efficacy rate was 82.76% and 69.70% respectively. The results showed that high dosage was more effective than low dosage (P=0.023), but was similar to Olsalazine sodium (healing rate of 34.29% and effective rate of 88.57% ,P>0. 05). Diarrhea was main adverse event, which was accounted for 2.8% (1/36) in high dosage group and 2.8% (1/36) in the Olsalazine sodium group. There was no adverse event in low dosage group. Conclusions 5-aminosalicylic acid zinc enteric-coated capsule is an effective agent in treatment of UC, especially in high dosage. It is similar to Olsalazine sodium in treatment of UC, and has advantages in reducing medication times.