Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications.@*METHODS@#From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus.@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair.@*CONCLUSION@#Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.

Distribution of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes / 中华流行病学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To describe the distribution of cerebral vascular hemodynamic indexes (CVHI).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A number of 25,355 age 35 and over were selected in the Northeast China by cluster sampling. CVHI were checked during baseline survey and were followed to see the occurrence of stroke. Distribution of CVHI among non-stroke population, individuals prior to the onset of stroke and patients with stroke were described.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The CVHI accumulative score, V(mean), V(max) and V(min) were dramatically decreasing, but RV, Zcv, WV and DR were significantly increasing as age increased. V(max), RV and CP were significantly higher in males but WV was lower than that of females. The CVHI accumulative score, V(min) and RV were 95.0, 10.23 and 75.8 in non-stroke population, 51.25, 6.71 and 122.72 pre stroke group, and 55.0, 6.78 and 115.89 in patients with stroke respectively. There were significant differences among three groups after controlling of age and sex (P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Variance of CVHI was closely related to age, and there appeared a significant abnormal of CVHI before and after stroke.</p>

A cohort study on cerebral vascular hemodynamics accumulative score and risks of stroke / 中华流行病学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To estimate relative risk (RR) of cerebral vascular hemodynamics indexes (CVHI) accumulative score as well as some other risk factors of stroke.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A cohort study was carried out in 25 355 participants aged 35 and over in Northeast of China from 1994 to 2001. In the baseline survey, exposure rates of hypertension, diabetes, family history of stroke and hypertension, etc. were collected and CVHI was examined. CVHI accumulative score was synthesized according to contribution of single index. During the 7-year following up, 228 stroke cases were identified and stroke coming on was defined as the endpoint of observation. Uni-variable and multiple variables analysis were carried out for estimating RR of CVHI and other risk factors of stroke.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Uni-variables analysis indicated that RR (95% confidence interval, CI) of Hypertension, heart diseases, diabetes, family history of hypertension and stroke, overweight or obesity, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking and CVHI < 75 scores were 3.23 (2.48 - 4.20), 2.53 (1.92 - 3.33), 2.38 (1.55 - 3.64), 1.32 (1.02 - 1.72), 1.82 (1.37 - 2.41), 1.62 (1.25 - 2.11), 1.48 (1.07 - 2.04), 1.76 (1.34 - 2.31) and 7.30 (5.43 - 9.80) respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that CVHI below 75 points, family history of stroke, cigarette smoking, heart disease, hypertension, age and sex were the factors being selected in equation. There was a significant dosage response between the decrease of CVHI score and the increase of stroke risk. RR of stroke reached 12.55 when CVHI below 75 points and history of hypertension appeared in the same individuals.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Abnormality of CVHI score seemed to be the most important and independent factor among stroke risk factors. Decrease of CVHI score might serve as a marker of high risk and play important role in stroke, especially coexistence with hypertension.</p>