ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical effects and related complications of surgical and endovascular treatments of paraclinoid aneurysms. Methods Seventy-two consecutive patients with paraclinoid aneurysm admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were enrolled retrospectively. They were confirmed by head and neck CT angiography and DSA examination,including 45 females and 27 males. According to the different treatment modalities, 72 patients were divided into endovascular embolization group ( n=38,stent-assisted coil embolization) and microsurgery group (n=34,including aneurysm clipping or intracranial and extracranial vascular bypass plus trapping of aneurysms). The baseline data and aneurysm diameter of both groups were recorded and analyzed. Baseline data included age,sex,cranial nerve injury,Hunt-Hess grade,etc. The new cranial nerve injury,aneurysm recurrence and Glasgow outcome scale ( GOS) scores were compared between the two groups,and the size of recurrent and non-recurrent aneurysms were analyzed. The age, aneurysm diameter,and prognostic score were compared in patients with Hunt-Hess grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ in both groups. Results (1 ) The age of patients in the endovascular embolization group was older than that in the microsurgery group (60 ±10 years vs. 54 ± 10 years,t= -2. 490),the diameter of aneurysms was smaller than that of microsurgery group (5[4,8] mm vs. 9[5,16] mm,Z=3. 026). There were significant differences between the two groups ( all P <0. 05 ) . There were no significant differences in gender, incidence of visual impairment and Hunt-Hess grading between the two groups (all P >0. 05). (2) The patients of both groups were followed up for 6 months. There were no significant differences in GOS score, improvement of postoperative visual acuity,and immediate visual impairment after surgery ( all P>0. 05). The recurrence rate of aneurysms in the endovascular embolization group was higher than that in the microsurgery group. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups (18. 4%[7/38] vs. 2. 9%[1/34], χ2=4. 350,P<0. 05). (3) In the endovascular embolization group, the diameter of aneurysm in recurrent patients was larger than that in non-recurrent patients,and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (10[8,15] mm vs. 5[3,7] mm,Z = -2. 356, P<0. 05). (4) For aneurysm patients with Hunt-Hess grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ, the GOS score of the endovascular embolization group was lower than that of the microsurgery group,and the difference was statistically significant (4[3,4] vs. 5[4,5],Z= -2. 282,P<0. 05]. Conclusion For paraclinoid aneurysms,the recurrence rate of aneurysms with microsurgical treatment is lower than that of endovascular embolization,and is beneficial to the prognosis of patients with Hunt-Hess grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ.