Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 50(3): e5396, 2017. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839263

ABSTRACT

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the common and specific microvascular complications of diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the anti-angiogenic effect of kaempferol and explore its underlying molecular mechanisms. The mRNA expression level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placenta growth factor (PGF) and the concentrations of secreted VEGF and PGF were measured by qTR-PCR and ELISA assay, respectively. Human retinal endothelial cells (HRECs) proliferation, migration, and sprouting were measured by CCK-8 and transwell, scratching wound, and tube formation assays, respectively. Protein levels were determined by western blot. High glucose (25 mM) increased the mRNA expression levels of VEGF and PGF as well as the concentrations of secreted VEGF and PGF in HRECs, which can be antagonized by kaempferol (25 µM). Kaempferol (5-25 µM) significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration, migration distance and sprouting of HRECs under high glucose condition. The anti-angiogenic effect of kaempferol was mediated via downregulating the expression of PI3K and inhibiting the activation of Erk1/2, Src, and Akt1. This study indicates that kaempferol suppressed angiogenesis of HRECs via targeting VEGF and PGF to inhibit the activation of Src-Akt1-Erk1/2 signaling pathway. The results suggest that kaempferol may be a potential drug for better management of DR.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/metabolism , Endothelial Cells/drug effects , Kaempferols/pharmacology , Placenta Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Retina/pathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Immunohistochemistry
2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 49(6): e4806, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951682

ABSTRACT

New generation antidepressant therapies, including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs), were introduced in the late 1980s; however, few comprehensive studies have compared the benefits and risks of various contemporary treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) in young patients. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases was conducted from 1970 to January 2015. Only clinical trials that randomly assigned one SNRI or placebo to patients aged 7 to 18 years who met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder were included. Treatment success, dropout rate, and suicidal ideation/attempt outcomes were measured. Primary efficacy was determined by pooling the risk ratios (RRs) of treatment response and remission. Acceptability was determined by pooling the RRs of dropouts for all reasons and for adverse effects as well as suicide-risk outcomes. Five trials with a total of 973 patients were included. SNRIs were not significantly more effective than placebo for treatment response but were for remission. The comparison of patients taking SNRIs that dropped out for all reasons and those taking placebo did not reach statistical significance. Significantly more patients taking SNRIs dropped out for adverse effects than those taking placebo. No significant difference was found in suicide-related risk outcomes. SNRI therapy does not display a superior efficacy and is not better tolerated compared to placebo in these young patients. However, duloxetine has a potential beneficial effect for depression in young populations, showing a need for further research.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Placebos/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Desvenlafaxine Succinate/therapeutic use , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Milnacipran
3.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 48(11): 973-982, Nov. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-762908

ABSTRACT

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a common psychiatric mood disorder affecting more than 1-2% of the general population of different European countries. Unfortunately, there is no objective laboratory-based test to aid BD diagnosis or monitor its progression, and little is known about the molecular basis of BD. Here, we performed a comparative proteomic study to identify differentially expressed plasma proteins in various BD mood states (depressed BD, manic BD, and euthymic BD) relative to healthy controls. A total of 10 euthymic BD, 20 depressed BD, 15 manic BD, and 20 demographically matched healthy control subjects were recruited. Seven high-abundance proteins were immunodepleted in plasma samples from the 4 experimental groups, which were then subjected to proteome-wide expression profiling by two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight/time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomic results were validated by immunoblotting and bioinformatically analyzed using MetaCore. From a total of 32 proteins identified with 1.5-fold changes in expression compared with healthy controls, 16 proteins were perturbed in BD independent of mood state, while 16 proteins were specifically associated with particular BD mood states. Two mood-independent differential proteins, apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and Apo L1, suggest that BD pathophysiology may be associated with early perturbations in lipid metabolism. Moreover, down-regulation of one mood-dependent protein, carbonic anhydrase 1 (CA-1), suggests it may be involved in the pathophysiology of depressive episodes in BD. Thus, BD pathophysiology may be associated with early perturbations in lipid metabolism that are independent of mood state, while CA-1 may be involved in the pathophysiology of depressive episodes.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Apolipoprotein A-I/blood , Apolipoproteins/blood , Bipolar Disorder/blood , Carbonic Anhydrase I/blood , Lipid Metabolism Disorders/metabolism , Lipoproteins, HDL/blood , Proteomics , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Databases, Protein , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , Down-Regulation , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional , Immunoblotting , Immunoprecipitation , Lipid Metabolism Disorders/complications , Mass Spectrometry/methods
4.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 48(3): 198-206, 03/2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-741249

ABSTRACT

There has been concern regarding the use of controversial paradigms for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to manage treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of bilateral rTMS compared with unilateral and sham rTMS in patients with TRD. PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EAGLE and NTIS databases were searched to identify relevant studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for TRD patients were included. The response was defined as the primary outcome, and remission was the secondary outcome. Ten RCTs that included 634 patients met the eligibility criteria. The risk ratio (RRs) of both the primary and secondary outcomes of bilateral rTMS showed non-significant increases compared to unilateral rTMS (RR=1.01, P=0.93; odds ratio [OR]=0.77, P=0.22). Notably, the RR of the primary bilateral rTMS outcome was significantly increased compared to that for sham rTMS (RR=3.43, P=0.0004). The results of our analysis demonstrated that bilateral rTMS was significantly more effective than sham rTMS but not unilateral rTMS in patients with TRD. Thus, bilateral rTMS may not be a useful paradigm for patients with TRD.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Environmental Exposure , Phthalic Acids/urine , Biomarkers/urine , Canada , Predictive Value of Tests , Respiratory Function Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL