ABSTRACT
Objective:To assess the value of the ROX index in evaluating the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with coronavirus infected disease (COVID-19).Methods:This is a retrospective study. The included patients were diagnosed as COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Cancer Center of Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from February 15, 2020 to March 15, 2020. All the patients were treated by HFNC. According to whether the patient subsequently received non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or invasive positive pressure ventilation, patients were divided into the HFNC success group and the HFNC failure group. Parameters in the two groups such as basic characteristics, lactic acid, number of chest radiographs, APACHE II, lymphocyte count, baseline respiratory rate, baseline percutaneous oxygen saturation, baseline PaO 2/FiO 2, baseline ROX index, and ROX index after 2, 6 and 12 h HFNC treatment were analyzed with t test, Chi-square test or rank sum test. Results:A total of 57 cases were included in this study. There were no significant differences in sex, age, comorbidities, lactic acid, quadrants of chest radiograph lung infection, APACHE II, lymphocyte count, and baseline respiratory frequency, transcutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygenation index, and ROX index between the HFNC success group and the HFNC faliure group ( P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that ROX index after 2 h HFNC treatment ( OR=0.069), ROX index after 6 h HFNC treatment ( OR=0.194) and ROX index after 12 h HFNC treatment ( OR=0.036) were all protective factors for the therapeutic effect of HFNC treatment in COVID-19 patients. ROC curve showed that there were significant differences in ROX index after 2 h HFNC treatment, ROX index after 6 h HFNC treatment, and ROX index after 12 h HFNC treatment ( P<0.05). In the evaluation index, the area under the ROC curve of the ROX index after 2 h HFNC treatment was 0.838, the sensitivity was 64.5%, and the specificity was 100%. After 6 h HFNC treatment, the area under the ROX index ROC curve was 0.762, the sensitivity was 64.5%, and the specificity was 92.3%. After 12 h HFNC treatment, the ROX index ROC curve area was 0.866, the sensitivity was 67.7%, and the specificity was 100%. Conclusions:The ROX index can be used to evaluate the efficacy of HFNC in COVID-19 patients in a timely, simple and real-time manner.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the profile and antibiotic resistance of bacteria in patients with ascites infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in order to provide a reference for rational clinical use of antibiotics. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted. The bacteria isolated from ascetic fluid patients admitted from January 1st, 2004 to October 31st, 2015 to ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were identified, and their susceptibility to antibiotics was analyzed. Patients, who were admitted from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2009 were assigned to group A, and patients admitted afterwards were assigned to group B. Results A total of 637 specimens of ascetic fluid were examined, with 185 positive culture (29.0%) during the 12 years, and 203 strains of bacteria were found. Among them 126 strains (62.1%) of gram-negative bacteria (G-), 54 (26.6%) of gram-positive bacteria (G+) and 23 (11.3%) strains of fungi were found. Compared the result of group B with that of group A, the proportion of G- bacteria was increased [71.2% (99/139) vs. 44.2% (27/64)], and that of G+ decreased [17.3% (24/139) vs. 46.9% (30/64)] in group B. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 20.34, P = 0.001). The main pathogenic bacteria were G-, and Enterobacteriaceae was the most common pathogenic bacteria in intra-abdominal infection of ICU patients. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae(35.7%, 10.3%) ranked in the first and third in G- bacteria, respectively. The resistant rate of Escherichia coli against penicillin and third generation cephalosporin were > 95.0% and > 73.3%, and it showed a sensitive rate of 70% to β-lactam/inhibitor, amikacin and minocycline, and a higher sensitivity to carbapenems and tigecycline (11.1%, 0). Forty-eight strains of non-fermentation bacteria were found with a rate of 23.7%. The positive rates of Acinetobacter baumannii in groups A and B were 7.8% (5/64) and 23.7% (33/139), respectively, and they ranked first among non-fermentation bacteria. Twenty strains (62.5%) multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were found. Acinetobacter baumannii showed a resistance rate of 84.6% to cefoperazone/sulbactam, 35.3% to minocycline, and 53.3% to tigecycline. Candida albicans was the most commonly isolated fungus in intra-abdominal infections (87.5%). No strains resistant to common antifungal drugs were isolated. Conclusions G- bacteria was the main pathogen in intra-abdominal infection in patients with ascites. Non-fermenters showed an increasing trend of producing infection, and the proportion of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection increased year by year, and more attention should be taken by attending doctors.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical and epidemiologieal feat ures of epidemic cerebrospinal meningitis in recent 3 years,aiming to develop the strategies for controlling this disease.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 65 hospitalized patients with epidemic cerehrospinal meningitis from 2003 to 2006.Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results The majority of these 65 patients were juvenile and adult,accounting for 44.6%(29 cases)and 35.4%(23 cases),respectively,while the infant patients account for the smallest percentage,only 6.2%(4 cases).Most cases occurred in spring(from February to April).The clinical features of most patients belonged to common type(72.3%),followed by fulminant type(27.7%).Five cases(7.7%)died,all of whom were fulminant cases.Totally 33 strains of Neisseria meningitidis were isolated,with positive culture rate of 50.8%(33/65 cases).The positive rate of blood culture was 44.6%(29/65 cases)and that of cerebrospinal fluid cuhure was 31.4%(16/51 cases).Isolates of Neisseria meningitidis were still highly sensitive to penicillin,ceftriaxone and cefotaxime.However,the resistance rates of strains to compound sulfamethoxazole,gentamycin and ciprofloxacin were all above 80%.Resuhs of serological typing revealed thai 82.8%(53/64 cases)cases belonged to group C.There were more severe cases and higher death rate in patients infected by group C meningococcus.Conclusions Serogroup C of the meningococcus have become the preponderant strains in Anhui Province.Most of the patients infected hy group C are J uveniles and adults.Penicillin and the third generation cephalosporins are still highly aclive againsl Neisseria meningitidis.