ABSTRACT
Objective:To compair the outcomes of repairing soft tissue defects of hand between a biodegrad- able repair patch—porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and skin grafting.Methods:From December, 2017 to December, 2018, 36 cases of hand soft tissue defect were treated and analyzed retrospectively. According to the defect area and treatment methods, 36 cases were divided into 2 groups: SIS group (21 cases) and grafting group(15 cases). In SIS group, the area of soft tissue defects was 2.0 cm×1.5 cm-9.0 cm×3.5 cm with an average of 5.3 cm×2.1 cm, treat- ed with SIS; In grafting group, the area of soft tissue defects was 9.0 cm×4.0 cm-16.0 cm×9.0 cm with an average of 12.0 cm×8.5 cm, treated with autologous skin grafting after wet dressing. Wound healing was evaluated at 14, 21 and 28 days, and 3 months after the surgery according to the appearance of colour, elasticity, sensory recovery and prog- noses of partial tendon exposure.Results:All patients were followed-up for 3 to 10 months, with an average of 5 months. All wounds in both groups were completely healed; the appearance was normal, and the skin elasticity and sensation had recovered. Sensation recovery in SIS group: 14 cases were good (66.6%), 5 cases were fine (23.8%), and 2 cases were bad (9.6%); in grafting group: 9 cases were good (60.0%), 4 cases were fine (26.0%), and 2 cases were bad (14.0% ). Wound healing effect in SIS group: 14 cases were good, 5 cases were fine, and 2 cases were bad; in grafting group: 9 cases were good, 4 cases were fine, and 2 cases were bad.Conclusion:The SIS patch can be used in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects in hand. There was no significant difference in colour compared to the sur- rounding skin and left no scar. The patch is an ideal repair material for superficial skin defects.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the feasibility and technique of using the anterolateral thigh perforator flap pedicled with the lateral branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LBLCFA) to repair soft tissue defect of extremities.Methods Eighty-six cases of anterolateral thigh perforator flap transplantation were performed from May,2014 to May,2018.A total of 37 cases of soft tissue defect of extremities were treated by anterolateral thigh perforator flap used the LBLCFA as vascular pedicle,of which there were 19 cases of upper limbs and 18 of lower limbs.There were 27 cases of defects caused by trauma,and 10 by soft tissue tumor resection.The flaps were designed centering around the point proximal to the midpoint of the iliac-patellar line.The dimensions of soft tissue defect were from 9.0 cm×6.0 cm to 26.0 cm×10.0 cm,and the flap were from 10.0 cm×7.0 cm to 27.0 cm×11.0 cm.The length of vascular pedicle ranged of 7.0-13.0 cm,with an average of 11.5 cm.The donor sites were directly sutured.All of the patients were followed-up regularly in the outpatient department.Results All the flaps survived and the donor sites were primarily healed.Of these 37 cases,2 trauma patients and 2 patients treated with local radiotherapy had poor wound healing,but still healed after multiple dressing changes.All the patients were followed-up for 3-26 months,with an average of 13 months.The texture,color and elasticity of the flap were similar to the surrounding tissue of the recipient sites,while only a linear scar remained at the donor sites.Ten tumor patients were treated with routine radiotherapy and chemotherapy after the repairation;there was no tumor recurrence during the follow-up period.Conclusion The LBLCFA gives off a relatively large and thick perforator proximal 5.0-7.0 cm of the iliacpatellar line,which locates in the upper lateral side,travels parallel to the vastus lateralis,and give off the skin and muscular perforators.The lateral branch can be used as pedicle to make into perforator flap or chimeric flap,which provides a novel selection of vascular pedicel for anterolateral thigh perforator flap.When the descending branch does not provide a thick and large perforator,the LBLCFA has important practical value and is worth utilizing in the clinic.