ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of MRI in reversible splenial lesion syndrome (RESLES) in children.Methods The clinical and MRI imaging data of 14 cases of RESLES in children were retrospectively reviewed.There were 4 males and 10 females,aging 11 to 35 months.Average age was (20±3) months.MRI studies were conducted in all the cases.Two experienced doctors analyzed independently the images and reached consensus.Results Fourteen cases showed the single abnormal signal in the splenial of corpus callosum on the initial cerebral MRI.Lesions in 10 of 14 cases appeared as isointensity on T1WI,hypo-intensity in 4 cases.Lesions in 14 cases were appeared as hyper-intensity on T2WI,hyper-/slightly hyper-intensity on FLAIR T2WI.The lesions were round,oval or irregular,with fuzzy boundary.DWI showed round or oval high signal with clear boundary.No edema around the lesion and no occupying effect were detected.After treatment,8 of 14 cases were reviewed after 7-14 d,and the abnormal signal in the corpus callosum disappeared in 5 cases,while the range was significantly reduced in 3 cases.MRI were reexamined after 1-2 months in 5 cases,and the lesions disappeared in the corpus callosum.One case didn't have MRI examination again after treatment and the clinical symptoms disappeared.Conclusions The clinical manifestations of RESLES in children are lack of specificity.And the cerebral MRI imaging is characterized by the reversible solitary lesion of the splenium,which can provide a reliable basis for clinical diagnosis and prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the effect of PRISMA statement on intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine .Methods Intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine from 2001 to 2011 were assessed according to the PRISMA scale and analyzed by Meta Analysist software.Results Seventy intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving 14-disease spectra were included in this study.PRISMA statement and systematic reviews and meta-analysespublished by au-thors in colleges and universities could improve their academic level (P<0.05), fund support and the number of authors showed no significant effect on their academic level.Conclusion Literature retrieval methods,literature screening methods,bias assessment methods, and other analyzing methods used systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine and their academic level can be improved by PRISMA statement.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the methodology of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine .Methods Basic data were extracted from 70 papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicinefrom 2001 to 2011 .Methodology used in these papers was assessed according to the AMSTAR Scale.The data were input into the Excelland analyzed using the SPSS7.0 and Meta-Analyst software.Results The methodology used in 34 papers (48.6%) was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tools.Fund support, number of authors and their affiliated institutions did not sig-nificantly affect the total score of methodology used in the 70 papers .Conclusion The methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine is not quite valid as its early design program and retrieval strategies are imperfect , and it does not provide the excluded literature list and the interest conflict.