ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To explore clinical effect of arthroscopy-assisted rotator cuff tendon transfer in treating irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT).@*METHODS@#From May 2015 to May 2018, 23 patients with unrepairable rotator cuff tears were treated with arthroscopy-assisted rotator cuff tendon transfer, and 21 patients were followed up finally, including 8 males and 13 females, aged from 48 to 82 years old with an average of(64.3±9.1) years old;the courses of disease ranged from 6 to 36 months with an average of (14.0±6.4) months. American Rotator and Elbow Surgeons Score(ASES) and Constant-Murley score were used to evaluate clinical efficacy before surgery and at the latest follow-up.@*RESULTS@#All 21 patients were followed up for 36 to 54 months with an average of (39.4±4.4) months. Axillary incision of 1 patient was redness, swelling and exudation after surgery, which healed after 3 weeks of dressing change, and exudate culture was negative. At the latest follow-up, MRI showed partial tearing of the metastatic tendon in 2 patients, but pain and movement of the affected shoulder were still better than before surgery. ASES increased from preoperative (41.0±9.6) scores to the latest follow-up (75.6±14.0) scores, and had statistical difference (t=10.50, P<0.01). Constant-Murley score increased from (49.8±7.1) scores before operation to (67.5±11.6) scores at the latest follow-up (t=11.27, P<0.01).@*CONCLUSION@#Arthroscopic assisted latissimus dorsalis tendon transposition restores physiological and anatomical structure of glenohumeral joint by reconstructing balance of horizontal and vertical couples of shoulder joint, thus achieving the stability of the shoulder joint, relieving shoulder pain and improving shoulder joint function.
Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Superficial Back Muscles , Rotator Cuff , Treatment Outcome , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Tendon Transfer , Arthroscopy , Range of Motion, Articular/physiologyABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To choose the best retraction agent for the clinic by evaluating the gingival inflammation related to three kinds of retraction agents.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>40 maxillary premolars were divided into four groups according to the randomized block design: Ferric sulfate group, aluminum chloride group, epinephrine group, sodium chloride group(control group), each 10 teeth, respectively used 25% AlCl3, 15.5% Fe2(SO4)3, 0.1% HCl-epinephrine, sodium chloride as retraction agents. The quantity of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and the active level of aspartate amino-transferase (AST) in gingival crevicular fluid were measured before and 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 days after retracting gingiva by four kinds retraction agents. The changes of GCF were calculated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The change of the GCF from the smallest to the largest was sodium chloride, 0.1% HCl-epinephrine, 25% AlCl,, 15.5% Fe2 (SO)3. Compared with sodium chloride, only 15.5% Fe2 (SO)3 in AST was the significant difference in the first day and the third day (P < 0.05). AST of ferric sulfate group after 1, 3 days greater than 800 IU.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>0.1% HCl-epinephrine is suggested in patient without cardiovascular disease. For patient with cardiovascular disease, the better substitute is 25% AlCl3. 15.5% Fe2 (SO4)3 will not be used until its concentration is fallen.</p>