ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationship between serum levels of PCT and neutrophil CD64 contents with the effect of hormone therapy and complications in the patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.Methods Sixty-five patients with primary nephrotic syndrome in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2016 were selected as the research subjects,all cases were treated with hormonal therapy,the serum levels of PCT and neutrophil CD64 were detected and their relationship with the curative effect and complications of nephrotic syndrome was analyzed.Results According to the PCT and neutrophil CD64 median levels,the cases were divided into the high level group and low level group,the results found that serum creatinine,serum protein,urine protein and pathological types had no statistical difference between the high level group and low level group.The hormone sensitivity had 15 cases in the patients with high PCT level,which was significantly lower than 21 cases in the patients with low PCT level;the hormone sensitivity had 14 cases in the patients with high neutrophil CD64 level,acute renal failure,infection and thrombus in the patients with high PCT level had 8,10,6 cases,which were significantly lower than those in the patients with low PCT level;acute renal failure,infection and thrombus in the patients with high neutrophil CD64 level had 7,11,6 cases,which were significantly higher than those in the patients with low neutrophil CD64 level (P<0.05).Conclusion The levels of serum PCT and neutrophil CD64 are significantly correlated with the therapeutic effect and clinical prognosis in the patients with nephrotic syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare set?up error and the positioning and error correction time between the infrared markers automatic positioning+ ExacTrac ( A) and the manual positioning+ cone?beam computed tomography ( CBCT) image?guided radiotherapy ( IGRT) ( B) in intensity?modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT) for lung cancer. Methods A total of 20 patients with lung cancer were randomly divided into Group A and Group B. In Group A, after automatic positioning, a group of orthogonal X?rays images were taken using kV X?rays, which matched digitally reconstructed radiographs to obtain errors before correction. In group B, after manual positioning, images were taken using CBCT, which matched reference computed tomography images to obtain errors before correction. The positioning and error correction time was recorded in both groups. After error correction, errors after correction were obtained in each group using IGRT. Between?group comparison was made using the paired t test. Results The errors in lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and spinning vertical directions were significantly reduced after correction in both Group A and B (A:1.8±1?3 vs. 0.4±0?1, P=0?000;2.7±1?9 vs. 0.5±0?1, P=0?000;2.8±1?7 vs. 0.4±0?1, P=0?000;1.6±1?0 vs. 0.3±0?9, P=0?000;B:2.6±1?9 vs. 0.5±0?5, P=0?000;3.1±2?5 vs. 0.6±0?6, P=0?000;2.1±1?8 vs. 0.5±0?5, P=0?000;0.9±0?7 vs. 0.3±0?1, P=0?000). There were no significant differences in errors after correction between Group A and Group B (0.4±0?1 vs. 0.5±0?5, P=0?204;0.5±0?1 vs. 0.6± 0?6, P=0?257;0.4± 0?1 vs. 0.5± 0?5, P=0?518;0.3± 0?9 vs. 0.3± 0?1, P=0?755 ) . However, the positioning and error correction time in Group A was significantly shorter than that in Group B (199.1±16?2 vs. 315.2±13?7, P=0?000). Conclusions The application of ExacTrac or CBCT IGRT can substantially reduce set?up errors and improve set?up accuracy in IMRT. In addition, the application of the ExacTrac system can substantially shorten the positioning and error correction time.