ABSTRACT
Objective:This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of Chinese medicine injection (CMI) in the treatment of heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods:China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMbase databases were electronically searched from inception to October 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CMI for treating HF after AMI. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the bias risk of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by ADDIS1.16.6 software and Stata 16.0 software.Results:A total of 55 studies were included involving 4 760 patients with HF after AMI and 3 types of CMIs, including Shenmai, Shenfu, Xinmailong injections. The results of network meta-analysis showed that Xinmailong injection was superior to Shenmai injection and Shenfu injection in improving the total effective rate and reducing left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD); Shenmai injection was superior to Xinmailong injection and Shenfu injection in reducing B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP); Shenfu injection was superior to Shenmai injection and Xinmailong injection in increasing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reducing heart rate (HR).Conclusions:The combined 3 types of CMIs for treating HF after AMI can improve the clinical efficacy when compared with conventional Western medicine treatment. Among them, Xinmailong injection is better in improving the total effective rate and reducing LVEDD, Shenmai injection is more advantageous in reducing BNP, and Shenfu injection has the best efficacy in improving LVEF and reducing HR.
ABSTRACT
Objective:This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment.Methods:We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP databases from inception to 1 September 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared conventional therapies and ivabradine with conventional therapies in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included and analyzed. After data extraction and literature quality evaluation, we use the Review Manager 5.4 to perform the meta-analysis and publication bias test.Results:5 studies enrolling 494 patients were included. Compared with conventional therapies (control group), ivabradine and conventional therapies (observation group) significantly reduced resting heart rate [ MD=-7.58, 95% CI(-12.40, -2.76), Z=3.08, P=0.002], left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) [ MD=-4.48, 95% CI(-7.33, -1.64), Z=3.09, P=0.002], left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) [ MD=-4.94, 95% CI(-7.29, -2.59), Z=4.12, P<0.001], B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) [ MD=-212.39, 95% CI(-230.55, -194.23), Z=22.92, P<0.001], New York Heart Association (NYHA) class [ MD=-0.36, 95% CI(-0.44, -0.27), Z=8.46, P<0.001] and Minnesota Questionnaire Score [ MD=-10.43, 95% CI(-15.72, -5.13), Z=3.86, P=0.001]. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) levels [ MD=1.31, 95% CI(0.64, 1.97), Z=3.85, P=0.001], 6-minute walk test level (6MWT) [ MD=54.83, 95% CI(40.58, 69.08), Z=7.54, P<0.001], systolic blood pressure [ MD=4.72, 95% CI(0.91, 8.54), Z=2.43, P=0.02], the incidence of visual symptoms (phosphene) [ OR=7.22, 95% CI(1.32, 45.00), P=0.02] and symptomatic bradycardia [ OR=8.90, 95% CI(1.21, 65.75), P=0.03] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group after treatment. In addition, there were no significant difference in the incidence of acute event between the two groups [ OR=0.72, 95% CI(0.12, 4.29), P=0.72]. Conclusions:Meta analysis showed that ivabradine combined β receptor blockers can effectively reduce resting heart rate and improve cardiac function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, but may increase the incidence of hallucinations and symptomatic bradycardia.