ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of in-situ split liver transplantation (ISSLT) in children.Methods From June 2015 to August 2018,10 liver grafts from DBD were split in-situ.All the donors were male,and the median age of the donors was 28.5 year old (18-48 year).One left half graft and 9 left lateral lobe grafts (including 2 reduced size grafts) were transplanted to 10 pediatric recipients.Four grafts were transplanted in our center,and the rest 6 grafts were shared to other two transplant center.The primary diseases of the recipients included biliary atresia (8/10),hepatic sinus obstruction syndrome (1/10) and Alagille syndrome (1/10).The median age of the recipients was 10 month (7 month-11 year),and the mean body weight was 9.8 ± 6.6 kg (5-28 kg).Results All liver grafts were split in-situ.The mean split time of liver grafts was 88.5 ± 18.9 min.The mean weight of split grafts was 336.7-± 85.4 g.All recipients were subjected to piggyback liver transplantation.Operation time was 542.5 ± 112.1 min.Anhepatic time was 52.0 ±-13.5 min.GRWR was (3.98 ±0.96)％.GRWR of two cases was more than 5％,so segment Ⅲ was partially reduced.During the follow-up period,9 cases were alive and 1 case died due to multiple organ failure 1 day after liver transplantation.Conclusions ISSLT can enlarge the graft pool for children and achieve good results.
ABSTRACT
Objective To characterize the clinical manifestations and to evaluate the value of the electrophysio-logical examination in patients with peripheral nerves injuries caused by neurobrucellosis. Methods Electrophysiology examination was conducted in 32 patients with peripheral nerve injuries caused by neurobrucellosis and 32 normal controls who had equivalent age and gender. The results were further statistically analyzed. Results There were sig-nificant difference between patients and healthy control group in distal motor latency (DML), compound motor active potentials (CMAP) amplitude, motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), sensory nerve action potential latency(SL),senso-ry nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) ( P﹤0.05). Electrophysiology examination revealed peripheral nerve damage of limbs involving, both sensory nerve and motor nerves, of which sen-sory and motor nerve injuries accounted for 55.47% and 16.80%, respectively. Median and sural nerve injuries were most frequently affected in upper (64) and lower limbs (16). Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity was delayed in 43 nerves (16.80%) of 256 examined motor nerves and in 142 nerves (55.47%) of 256 examined sensory nerves. The damage of the sensory nerves was more severe than those of the motor nerves and damage of nerves in the upper limbs was more severe than those in the lower limbs. Conclusion Electrophysiologoical examination provides objective basis for the diagnosis of peripheral nerve injuries in neurobrucellosis.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate cachexia in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>By analyzing the clinical data of 5118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013, cachexia was investigated and clinical outcomes between cachexia patients and non-cachexia patients was compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The total cachexia rate of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7%(803/5118). The highest rate of cachexia was 34.0%(89/262) in patients with pancreatic cancer followed by gastric cancer 22.4%(261/1164), colon cancer 21.7%(146/672), and rectal cancer 20.1%(117/581). In cachexia group and non-cachexia group, the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1%(539/803) and 74.5%(3214/4315) respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the non-cachexia group, the cachexia group was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay [(11.5±6.2) d vs. (9.4±4.9) d, P<0.05], slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4±0.9) d vs. (3.2±0.8) d, P<0.05], longer postoperative time to intake of semifluid [(4.4±1.5) d vs. (3.9±1.1) d, P<0.05], and more postoperative complications within 28 days after radical surgery [8.9%(48/539) vs. 5.8%(186/3214), P<0.05]. After radical surgery, the ICU admission rate of the cachexia group [24.3%(131/539)] was higher than that of the non-cachexia group [20.1%(646/3214)] with significant difference(P<0.05). Compared to non-cachexia group, the reoperation rate [3.2%(17/539) vs. 1.5%(48/3214), P<0.05], ventilator support rate [8.0%(43/539)vs. 5.7%(184/3214), P<0.05] and mortality [2.4%(13/539) vs. 1.1%(35/3214), P<0.05] in the cachexia group were all significantly higher(all P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Cachexia is commen in patients with digestive system cancer. Cachexia has significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Cachexia , Colonic Neoplasms , Defecation , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Reoperation , Stomach NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the cachexia morbidity among hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.Method By analyzing the clinical data of 5 118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013,we investigated the cachexia morbidity and compared the clinical outcome between cachectic patients and noncachectic patients.Results The overall cachexia morbidity of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7％ (803/5 118).The highest cachexia morbidity was 34.0％ (89/173),found in patients with pancreatic cancer.In cachectic group and non-cachectic group,the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1％ (539/803) and 74.5％ (3 214/4 315),respectively (P =0.000).Compared to the non-cachectic group,the cachetic group had significantly longer postoperative hospital days [(11.5 ±6.2) d vs (9.4 ±4.9) d,P =0.003],slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4 ±0.9) d vs (3.2 ±0.8) d,P =0.013],longer postoperative time to intake semifluid [(4.4 ± 1.5) d vs (3.9 ± 1.3) d,P =0.002],and more postoperative complications in 28 days after surgery [8.9％ (48/539) vs 5.8％ (186/3 214),P=0.006].After surgery,131 patients in the cachectic group were transferred to the ICU,and 646 patients in non-cachectic group transferred to the ICU (24.3％ vs 20.0％,P=0.026).Compared to the non-cachecic group,the reoperation rate [3.2％ (17/539) vs 1.5％ (48/3214)],ventilator support rate [8.0％ (43/539) vs 5.7％ (184/3 214)],and mortality [2.4％ (13/539) vs 1.1％ (35/3 214)] of the cachectic group were all significantly higher (P =0.006,0.042,0.011).Conclusions Cachexia is common in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer,especially in patients with pancreatic cancer.Cachexia has negative impact on the clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively, and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Ninety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery(OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216)(P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm(P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm(P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs.(11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1% and 2.3%(P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Laparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.</p>