Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1283-1289, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-330628

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Their removal is a critical and challenging aspect of CRC treatment. We investigated the prognosis and risk factors of patients with CRC and liver metastases (CRCLM) who underwent simultaneous resections for both lesions.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2009 to August 2016, 102 patients with CRCLM received simultaneous resections of CRCLM at our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical data and analyzed their outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Median follow-up time was 22.7 months; no perioperative death or serious complications were observed. Median OS was 55.5 months; postoperative OS rates were 1-year: 93.8%, 3-year: 60.7%, and 5-year: 46.4%. Median DFS was 9.0 months; postoperative DFS rates were 1-year: 43.1%, 3-year: 23.0%, and 5-year 21.1%. Independent risk factors found in multivariate analysis included carcinoembryonic antigen ≥100 ng/ml, no adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor thrombus in liver metastases, and bilobar liver metastases for OS; age ≥60 years, no adjuvant chemotherapy, multiple metastases, and largest diameter ≥3 cm for DFS.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Simultaneous surgical resection is a safe and effective treatment for patients with synchronous CRCLM. The main prognostic factors are pathological characteristics of liver metastases and whether standard adjuvant chemotherapy is performed.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms , Mortality , General Surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Hepatectomy , Liver Neoplasms , Mortality , General Surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 316-321, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-358009

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer in China, an area of high hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although several staging systems are available, there is no consensus on the best classification to use because multiple factors, such as etiology, clinical treatment and populations could affect the survival of HCC patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This study analyzed 743 HBV-related Chinese HCC patients who received surgery first and evaluated the predictive values of eight different commonly used staging systems in the clinic.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The overall 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates and a median survival were 91.5%, 70.3%, 55.3% and 72 months respectively. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging systems had the best stratification ability and showed the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) values (2896.577), followed by tumor-node-metastasis 7 th (TNM 7 th ) (AIC = 2899.980), TNM 6 th (AIC = 2902.17), Japan integrated staging score (AIC = 2918.085), Tokyo (AIC = 2938.822), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score (AIC = 2941.950), Chinese University Prognostic Index grade (AIC = 2962.027), and Okuda (AIC = 2979.389).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>BCLC staging system is a better staging model for HBV infection patients with HCC in Chinese population among the eight currently used staging systems. These identifications afford a large group of Chinese HCC patients with HBV infection and could be helpful to design a new staging system for a certain population.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Mortality , Pathology , China , Liver Neoplasms , Mortality , Pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate
3.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 3026-3029, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-263532

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The surgical management of occult breast cancer is controversial. We compared the outcomes of different treatments of occult breast cancer and evaluated the potential prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who presented to our hospital from 1968 to 2011 with a diagnosis of occult breast cancer. Patients were divided into three groups: 42 patients (63%) were treated with modified radical mastectomy+axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 16 patients (24%) were treated with ALND + postoperative radiotherapy, and 9 patients (13%) with only ALND. Survival analyses were undertaken to compare the efficacy of these three treatments.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 77 patients with occult breast cancer, 2 patients were lost to follow-up and 8 patients refused surgical treatment: 67 patients (90.4%) were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 62.2 (0.6-328.0) months. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant difference in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the three groups (P = 0.494 and 0.397, respectively). The prevalence of local recurrence was 11.9% for the mastectomy + ALND, 18.8% for ALND + radiotherapy, and 11.1% for ALND-only groups, and those for distant recurrence were 2.4%, 12.5%, and 11.1%, respectively. Compared with progesterone receptor-negative subjects, progesterone receptor-positive patients had better overall survival and lower recurrence rates (P = 0.057 and 0.062, respectively).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>There was no significant difference in outcomes between mastectomy and breast-preserving surgery. Expression of the progesterone receptor should be taken into account when evaluating the prognosis of occult breast cancer.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms , Diagnosis , Mortality , Therapeutics , Lymph Node Excision , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Receptors, Progesterone , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL