ABSTRACT
objective:To analyze the contributed papers and publications in the first half year of 2020 from Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine， especially the COVID-19 papers， to provide basis for the academic journals to win out during the public hot points. Methods:All the papers contributed in the first half year of 2020 from Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine， were collected to analyze the sources parameters， editing parameters. All published papers were collected to analyze the sources parameters， editing parameters and their usages （downloads and citations）. Results:There were 450 papers contributed in the first half year of 2020， 129 papers were accepted accounting for 28.67%. Among them， 116 papers were COVID-19 papers accounting for 25.78%， and 32 papers were accepted accounting for 24.81%. the March was the highest month of contribution， also for COVID-19 papers. Many academic domains such as infectious disease， women and children health， clinic science， chronic disease， social medicine， public hygiene and others were predominated among those papers. COVID-19 papers dominated in domains of infectious disease and social medicine. According to the non-COVID-19 papers， the COVID-19 papers had higher numbers of peer reviewers， lower days for back improvement， lower days for refusals or acceptance， also had lower copy percentages by plagiarism check （all P<0.05）. there were 106 papers published in the first half year of 2020. Published COVID-19 papers had higher number of authors， higher numbers of references in term of governments reports， foreign references and less than 5 years references （all P<0.05）. Those published COVID-19 papers had better usages than those no-COVID-19 papers， adjusted downloads were 2 077.37/year vs 111.53/year， adjusted citations were 12.99/year vs 0.49/year. It was obvious that the published COVID-19 papers had very excellent social influences and academic influences （P<0.001）. Conclusion:Publication in the first half year of 2020 from Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine is high-qualified and is good for the journal’s improvement in social influences and academic influences. It is important for academic journals to pay more attention to the hot points of public health accordingly.