ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma and negative pressure drainage therapy have been widely used and achieved good clinical outcomes in the treatment of various chronic wounds. However, there is no randomized controlled trial regarding their combined effect on chronic refractory wounds. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma with negative pressure therapy on chronic refractory wounds. METHODS: Databases of CNKI, VIP, WanFang, SinoMed, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMbase were searched for the randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure therapy on chronic refractory wounds. Included studies were evaluated using the Cochrane system evaluation method. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The primary outcomes included wound healing rate, time for wound healing, length of hospital stay, pain score and positive rate of bacteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including 743 patients with chronic wounds. The observation group was treated with platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure drainage. The control group was treated with conventional dressing or simple negative pressure drainage. The Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control group, there was significantly increased wound healing rate [relative risk (RR)=2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.82, 2.62), P < 0.000 01], significantly shortened time for wound healing [mean standard difference=-0.81, 95%CI (-1.00,-0.62), P < 0.000 01], significantly shortened length of hospital stay [mean difference=-7.11, 95%CI (-8.12,-6.11), P < 0.000 01], and significantly lowered positive rate of bacteria [RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.22, 0.54), P < 0.000 01] in the observation group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the pain score [SMD=-5.97, 95%CI (-14.33, 2.40), P=0.16]. To conclude, platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure drainage can promote the healing of chronic refractory wounds and reduce the incidence of infection.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To compare the therapeutic effect between thunder-fire moxibustion combined with external applicaion of powder and thunder-fire moxibustion alone for mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis.@*METHODS@#A total of 70 patients with mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 35 cases in each group. In the observation group, thunder-fire moxibustion combined with external applicaion of powder were applied, Thunder-fire moxibustion was applied at Xuehai (SP 10), Liangqiu (ST 34), Neixiyan (EX-LE 4), Yanglingquan (GB 34) and point, external applicaion of powder was given to the affected knee after the treatment of thunder-fire moxibustion. Simple thunder-fire moxibustion was given in the control group. All patients in the two groups were treated once a day, 7 days as one course and the consecutive 4 courses were required, with an interval of 1 day between courses. Before and after treatment, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were used to assessed knee pain, stiffness and physical function in the two groups. In addition, the efficacy was evaluated.@*RESULTS@#Compared before treatment, the VAS scores, total scores of WOMAC, pain scores, stiffness scores and physical function scores were reduced after treatment in the two groups (<0.01), and the scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (<0.01, <0.05). The total effective rate was 97.0% (32/33) in the observation group, which was superior to 91.2% (31/34) in the control group (<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Thunder-fire moxibustion combined with external applicaion of powder are superior to simple thunder-fire moxibustion in improving the symptoms and delaying the development of the disease for mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis.