ABSTRACT
Introduction: We report a case of intractable nausea of a terminal malignant lymphoma patient with diabetes, which improved by sublingual administration of asenapine. Case: A 78-year-old man suffering from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with diabetes presented intractable nausea and vomiting. Those symptoms were thought to be due to masses and nodules in the right frontal lobe and the cerebellum, and/or due to edema in the peripheral brain parenchyma. Because it was difficult to take medicines orally, we selected injections to control those symptoms. However, the combination of metoclopramide, haloperidol, and hydroxyzine injections failed to relieve nausea. Olanzapine is effective against nausea but is contraindicated for diabetic patients, so asenapine, one of the multi-acting receptor-targeted antipsychotics the same as olanzapine, was expected alternatively. The patient was administrated asenapine sublingually 5mg once a day before bedtime. This administration of asenapine remarkably improved his nausea. Discussion: Sublingual asenapine dose may be an effective therapeutic option for intractable nausea.
ABSTRACT
In order to intervene in the management of pain of cancer from an early stage. Our palliative care team (PCT), including pharmacists, makes the ward rounds (screening rounds) of the patients receiving opioids at our hospital. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of screening rounds activity by the PCT and its current problems, and to explore how to resolve the problems. We retrospectively studied the records of 196 patients who had receivede interventions by the PCT, with regard to intervention status and prescription proposal (228 subjects) about drug therapy by us. Study groups were as follows: 103 patients to whom interventions were deliveed at the request of medical doctors (intervention request group) and 93 patients who had interventions by the PCT after PCT-screening rounds (screening group). PCT-screening rounds caused to increase the number of interventions by the PCT. After PCT-screening rounds, the cases of intervention started by the request of medical doctors, who had given no heed to PCT intervention, also increased in numher. In this study, some problems with palliative intervention were also brought to light. Even in the screening group where the PCT largely intervened, 33% of prescription proposal by the PCT was ignored. This problem may be, at least in part, due to inadequate communication between PCT and ward staff through an electronic medical recording card, leading to poor relationship between PCT and ward staff. In the future, the PCT needs to work cooperatively with ward staff through direct communication such as medical conference to perform better intervention.
ABSTRACT
Recently, in order to make chemotherapy, safer and more effective various forms of intervention by pharmacists are needed. In this paper, we report our experience in intervening in the administration of gefitinib to a patient with dysphagia. Chemotherapy with an intravenous drip injection to the 58 year-old woman admitted to our hospital for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was withdrawn due to severe pancytopenia after the first cycle of pharamcotherapy. Then, as an altermative, oral medication, of gefitinib was suggested by medical doctors. However, the oral administration was inappropriate to the condition of the patient. She was unable to keep taking gefitinib pills because she had been suffering from a progressive swallowing disturbance due to progressive non-small cell lung cancer. Thus, we proposed another oral administration method in which gefitinib was resuspended in thickening agents. This method made it possible for the patient to take gefitinib without any adverse events until the day before the patient died.