Comparison of Onset Time and Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Mepivacaine and Bupivacaine with Morphine on Caudal Block / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Caudal injection of local anesthetics with morphine is the most common anesthetic technique for perianal operation and postoperative analgesia. This study was purposed to compare the onset time of caudal analgesia, postoperative analgesic effect and side effects. METHOD: Sixty healthy patients scheduled for perianal operation were divided into 2 groups randomly. Group I was given 2 mg of morphine in 20 ml of 2% mepivacaine via sacral hiatus. Group II was also given 2 mg of morphine in 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine caudally. We measured the onset time of caudal block, time to the first request of analgesics, the number of analgesics within 24 hours and the incidence of postoperative side effects. Analgesic effect was evaluated by visual analogue scales (VAS) at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. RESULT : The onset time of caudal block for operation and the first request time of analgesic for postoperative pain was significantly shorter in group I than group II. The analgesic use in the first 24 hours was significantly more in group I than group II. The side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the combined use of morphine and bupivacaine provided better postoperative analgesia than the combined use of morphine and mepivacaine.

Comparison of Epidural Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Intravenous Patient-Contolled Analgesia for Pain Relief after Cesarean Delivery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Epidural administration of local anesthetics and opiate or intravenous administration of opiate and ketorolac has proven to be effective in the treatment of postoperative pain. Studies that compare epidual morphine-bupivacaine vs intravenous nalbuphine-ketorolac administration showed conflicting results. We compared the ability and side effects of epidural (EPI-PCA) morphine-bupivacaine versus intravenous (IV-PCA) nalbuphine-ketorolac for postoperative pain relief after cesarean delivery. METHOD: Sixty healthy women were randomly assigned to receive an epidural bolus of morphine 3 mg mixed with 0.5% bupivacaine 10 ml, followed by a EPI-PCA with 0.0125% morphine and 0.125% bupivacaine (basal infusion 2 ml/hr, bolus 0.5 ml, lock-out interval 15 min) or intravenous bolus of nalbuphine 5 mg, followed by a IV-PCA with 0.05% nalbuphine and 0.15% ketorolac (basal infusion 2 ml/hr, bolus 0.5 ml, lock-out interval 30 min) for pain relief after cesarean delivery. The intensity of pain was assessed by the patient, who was unawared of the dose given, using a visual analog scale (VAS). To compare intensity of pain, VAS was used at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 40 hour after the end of surgery. RESULT : EPI-PCA group had significant lower visual analog scale (VAS) at immediate postoperative period, whereas no significant difference was observed when pain was assessed at other time sequence. Pruritus was more frequent with EPI-PCA group, although the incidence of other side effects were the same. CONCLUSION: We conclude that EPI-PCA or IV-PCA using morphine-bupivacaine or nalbuphine- ketorolac is relatively effective and safe method for the postoperative pain control. Although EPI-PCA with morphine-bupivacaine shows lower VAS at immediate postoperative period, IV-PCA with nalbuphine-ketorolac is a safe and effective alternative to EPI-PCA with morphine-bupivacaine for providing pain relief after cesarean delivery.