Predictors of High Peak Serum CK Levels in Doxylamine Intoxication

BACKGROUND: Because doxylamine succinate (DS) is an over-the-counter medicine, it can be obtained easily and is frequently used in suicidal attempts. Patients usually recover without serious complications, but occasionally rhabdomyolysis and even death can occur in DS intoxication. In this study, the authors tried to find out the independent predictors of high peak serum CK levels, i.e. probable rhabdomyolysis in DS intoxication. METHODS: The medical records of 41 patients who visited a hospital for DS intoxication from January 1, 2002 to April 30, 2003, were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In the group of DS only, initial occult blood of urine (P=0.003), initial WBC count (P=0.003) and confusion (P=0.007) were the best predictors of the peak serum CK level (2=0.724). In the group of DS with other drugs intoxication, initial creatinine level (P=0.003) and initial occult blood of urine (P=0.007) were the best predictors of the peak serum CK level (r2=0.784). In the cases of rhabdomyolysis patients, the time taken for the CK level to be increased over 1,000 IU/L was 1.9level to be increased over 1,000 IU/L was 1.9+/-0.6 days. CONCLUSION: In DS only intoxication, occult blood in initial urine analysis, initial high WBC count and confusion can be thought of as useful clinical predictors for high peak serum CK level case. In DS with other drugs intoxication, initial creatinine level and initial occult blood of urine can be considered as the best predictors. More than 2 days will be needed for the observation of serious complications in DS intoxication.

Attitude of cancer patients, their primary care givers and doctors toward end-of-life care

BACKGROUND: Decision about life sustaining treatments ought to be based on the patient's informed preferences. This study was to see if there were any differences in acceptance by patients, their primary care givers and doctors for end-of-life care according to situations, and if any, to analyse the factors related with different attitudes. METHODS: A structured questionnaire survey of end-of-life care preferences was performed on 162 cancer patients and their primary care givers in four university hospitals and one general hospital from March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000. A similar survey was done for doctors practicing at the above hospitals during the same period to investigate their attitudes toward providing end-of-life care to an assumed nearly bed-ridden patients. ANOVA, t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare acceptance of intervention among the groups or according to the various situations. Factors presumed to be related to the acceptance were sought and analysed by stepwise multiple regression. RESULTS: The difference in acceptance of intervention between the primary care giver group and the doctor group was not significant in almost every situation, showing significantly higher than the patient group (P<0.001). All three groups showed higher acceptance when a therapeutic intervention rather than a diagnostic test was proposed (P<0.001), when expected survival was 30 days rather than 7 (P<0.01), and when the therapeutic intervention was thought as non-invasive rather than invasive (P<0.001). The less anxious the patient was, the higher the acceptance from the patient. Patients with a religion had higher acceptance rate than non-religious patients. Primary care givers who expected cure of the disease accepted more of the postulated care than those who did not (P<0.05). Wives or mother-in-laws of patients showed lower acceptance than those in other relationship (P<0.05). The longer the patient had been diagnosed with cancer, the higher the acceptance of the primary care giver (P<0.1). Direct relatives showed higher acceptance than that of collaterals (P<0.1). Family doctors specializing in family medicine had lower acceptance than doctors of other specialties and interns (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The acceptance of intervention by patients was lower than that of primary care givers and doctors and depended on the expected survival and the type of intervention.