Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of the Korean Society of Biological Psychiatry ; : 71-78, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-786250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Suicide is a complex phenomenon not only caused by the individual's mental illness and economic situation, but also occurred in sociocultural contexts and relationships around the individual. Therefore, the attitudes, which include collective norms, thoughts and feelings of a population, toward suicide play a fundamental role in the prevention of suicide. Factor structure of Attitudes Toward Suicide (ATTS), developed by Renberg, is also various in different sociocultural contexts. This is the first study to investigate factor structure of ATTS along with nationwide sample of Korean adults.METHODS: This study analyzed the factor structure and reliability of ATTS in 1500 regionally stratified Korean adults. Exploratory factor analysis was performed by using principal axis factoring and varimax rotation.RESULTS: The selection of 33 ATTS items based on internal consistency and communality was conducted. Five factors were analyzed, which were named ‘Good reason,’ ‘Negative gaze,’ ‘Predictability,’ ‘Means of escape,’ and ‘Common secret,’ respectively. Explained total variance was 41.94%, and the internal consistency ranged from 0.516 to 0.740.CONCLUSIONS: Each of the five factors contains different semantic dimensions. Consistent with previous studies, factors containing permissive attitude toward suicide was high in those with history of suicidal thought and of suicide attempt. It is notable that the ‘Good reason’ showed higher score in elderly. This may be related to socioeconomic or physical adversities which have been considered the major cause of suicide in elderly.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Korea , Semantics , Suicide
2.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 43-51, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-765179

ABSTRACT

The Korean Mental Health Act has been radically reformed recently in order to improve psychiatric patients' human rights by regulating the compulsory admission process. However, the expert group brought up questions about difficulties in practice and incoherence in its philosophy before the Act was implemented. There are already discussions concerning the next revision of the Act. In such a situation, lessons can be learned from the experiences of other countries. Articles on psychiatric compulsory admission were comprehensively reviewed with the focus on legal criteria, and found that current trends worldwide include a move towards broad diagnostic criteria, use of capacity and treatability test, and treatment in the interest of health rather than safety. In addition, we introduce the Whittington scale, an assessment tool for the appropriateness of hospitalization used in the Connecticut Mental Health Center, US, as a reference for the similar procedure being implemented soon in Korea.


Subject(s)
Connecticut , Dangerous Behavior , Hospitalization , Human Rights , Korea , Mental Disorders , Mental Health , Philosophy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL