ABSTRACT
Adhesion formation after abdominal surgery is a commonly recognized entity. Many studies have shown that women giving birth by cesarean section are at the risk of developing complications related to the postoperative formation of adhesions including ileus, bowel obstructions, impaired fertility, and chronic abdominal pain. Among several adhesion barriers, one that has been tested in randomized, controlled trials is the hyaluronic cid-carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) membrane (Seprafilm®: Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA). This bioresorbable membrane serves as a mechanical barrier between surgically damaged tissues and resorbs afterwards. At our institution, we have used HA/CMC in cesarean sections. We report our experience with this patient population using placement of HA/CMC. This study enrolled 45 women who had undergone cesarean sections twice or more who had received HA/CMC during the previous cesarean section between January 2013 and November 2014. The incidence of adhesions to the area of abdominal wall incisions and uterine surface, intestinal obstructive symptoms, and adverse events were studied. The incidence of adhesions to midline incisions was 4.4% (n＝2). The filmy adhesion by major omentum was detected in these two cases. The incidence of adhesions to uterine surface was 2.2% (n＝1). The moderate thickness adhesion was detected at the left side of the vesico-uterine peritoneal incision by pelvic peritoneum which did not affect the operative procedure. No symptoms related to intestinal obstructions such as abdominal pains, nausea and vomiting were observed. No adverse events were observed. These three cases had fever which had nothing to do with HA/CMC applications but was attributable respectively to influenza infection, mastitis, phlebitis associated with a needle procedure. HA/CMC was considered a useful adhesion barrier membrane for use in cesarean sections as an adjunct intended to reduce the incidence of postoperative adhesions between the abdominal wall and the underlying viscera such as omentum, small bowel, and between the uterus and surrounding structures.
ABSTRACT
Catamenial pneumothorax (CP) is defined as a form of thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES) and the clinical manifestations and management of this disease are not consensual. Successful treatment depends on how closely pulmonary specialists and gynecologists work together. Such being the circumstances, we reviewed our experience with CP in terms of treatment and follow-up. We treated surgically many patients with pneumothorax during the period from 1989 to 2014, of which eight cases had endometriosis on the diaphragm, lung or pleura histologically. The median age at the time of operation was 37 (range, 17 to 41). CP was right-sided in seven of the eight patients (87.5%). Six patients underwent an examination with diagnostic laparoscopy and five had positive findings. The median period of follow-up after surgery was 33.5 months (range, 4 to 129 months). Two patients had no recurrence without hormonal therapy. Six other patients experienced a recurrence of pneumothorax, although two patients received dienogest after surgery. The use of only dienogest or both GnRHa and dienogest prevented recurrence in all patients. CP is a critical condition that requires prompt action, so after surgical treatment, the choice of hormonal therapy with a high rate of patient compliance are needed. No recurrence occurred in young patients who had only surgical treatment, suggesting that there were some associations between age and recurrence. Since we succeeded in preventing recurrence after using GnRHa in all cases, we recommend GnRHa or dienogest following GnRHa for the first choice of hormonal therapy after surgery. However, treatment with only dienogest could achieve successful results with no recurrence, so more case studies need to be done to make the best treatment choice for each case.