ABSTRACT
Objective@#It is one of the major functions of the clinical laboratory to clearly, accurately, and quickly communicate critical values directly to the patient care providers. Laboratory professionals are often confronted with many obstacles in critical value reporting, including establishing critical values, notifying the critical values to provider, and ensuring that the provider understands the severity of a critical result. @*Methods@#A total of 30 laboratory directors voluntarily answered the questionnaire by e-mail. The questionnaire covered demographic characteristics, establishing and updating critical values lists in clinical chemistry, thresholds of critical values, appropriate timeframes for critical results, notification process, and so on. @*Results@#Of the 30 participating institutions, 12 were general hospitals, three were commercial laboratories, and 15 were tertiary hospitals. The tests included in critical value lists are as follows in order of frequency: potassium, glucose, sodium, total calcium, chloride, ionized calcium, creatinine, magnesium, total bilirubin, phosphorus, pH, and so on. Ten of the 30 institutions notified critical value reports to the patient care providers within 1 hour. @*Conclusion@#This study presents the status of critical value reporting policy in Korean hospitals and a literature review on critical value reporting. In addition, this article provides core components and current regulatory requirements for critical value reporting. Critical value reporting systems should be approved, reviewed, and revised periodically.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Total cholesterol concentration measurement is important in the diagnosis of dyslipidemia and evaluation of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Measurement reliability for obtaining an accurate total cholesterol concentration requires procedure standardization. We evaluated the standardization status for total cholesterol concentration measurement through Korean external quality assessment (EQA) data analysis. @*Methods@#This study involved 1,670 laboratories that participated in the EQA of total cholesterol concentration measurements in 2019 for 32 products from different manufacturers. The target concentrations of three quality control (QC) materials (samples A, B, and C) were measured using the reference method and compared with EQA data. The performance criteria for total cholesterol concentration measurement were based on the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, with ± 3% inaccuracy. @*Results@#The target values and inaccuracies of the QC material based on the reference method measurements were 254.65 ± 7.64, 108.30 ± 3.25, and 256.29 ± 7.69 mg/dL (6.59 ± 0.20, 2.80 ± 0.08, and 6.63 ± 0.20 mmol/L) for samples A, B, and C, respectively.The performance criteria were not met in 42.7% laboratories for sample A, 68.4% of laboratories for sample B, and 38.0% laboratories for sample C. @*Conclusions@#Despite significant efforts to accurately measure total cholesterol concentrations, further actions are needed for measurement standardization. Manufacturers reporting values that differ from target values should check calibrator traceability; additional efforts to accurately measure total cholesterol concentrations are required for laboratories that use products from these manufacturers.
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical laboratories play a central role in health care. Many laboratories are taking a more focused and stringent approach to quality system management. In Korea, laboratory standardization efforts undertaken by the Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) and the Korean External Quality Assessment Scheme (KEQAS) may have facilitated an improvement in laboratory performance, but there are no fundamental studies demonstrating that laboratory standardization is effective. We analyzed the results of the KEQAS to identify significant differences between laboratories with or without KLAP and to determine the impact of laboratory standardization on the accuracy of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We analyzed KEQAS participant data on clinical chemistry tests such as albumin, ALT, AST, and glucose from 2010 to 2013. As a statistical parameter to assess performance bias between laboratories, we compared 4-yr variance index score (VIS) between the two groups with or without KLAP. RESULTS: Compared with the group without KLAP, the group with KLAP exhibited significantly lower geometric means of 4-yr VIS for all clinical chemistry tests (P<0.0001); this difference justified a high level of confidence in standardized services provided by accredited laboratories. Confidence intervals for the mean of each test in the two groups (accredited and non-accredited) did not overlap, suggesting that the means of the groups are significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed that practice standardization is strongly associated with the accuracy of test results. Our study emphasizes the necessity of establishing a system for standardization of diagnostic testing.
Subject(s)
Accreditation , Bias , Clinical Chemistry Tests , Delivery of Health Care , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Glucose , KoreaABSTRACT
We report a case of subcutaneous infection in a 55-yr-old Korean diabetic patient who presented with a cystic mass of the ankle. Black fungal colonies were observed after culturing on blood and Sabouraud dextrose agar. On microscopic observation, septated ellipsoidal or cylindrical conidia accumulating on an annellide were visualized after staining with lactophenol cotton blue. The organism was identified as Exophiala salmonis by sequencing of the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region. Phaeohyphomycosis is a heterogeneous group of mycotic infections caused by dematiaceous fungi and is commonly associated with immunocompromised patients. The most common clinical manifestations of subcutaneous lesions are abscesses or cystic masses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case in Korea of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by E. salmonis that was confirmed by molecular analysis and identification of morphological characteristics. This case suggests that E. salmonis infections are no longer restricted to fish.