Comparison of the medical counseling by PC communication between family medicine and internal medicine according to ICPC

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this survey was to assess knowledge of the public on family medicine through the analysis of medical counseling by PC communication and to compare them with that of internal medicine. METHODS: This survey analyzed the contents of medical counseling by PC communication according to ICPC from Oct. 1996 to Jun. 1998. The survey was done by means of E-mail in Nownuri eyes and the selected medical departments were those of those of family medicine and internal medicine in Pusan National University Hospital. RESULTS: The total number of questions was 342, including 181 in the department of family medicine and 161 in internal medicine. In the analysis of medical counseling according to ICPC, there was a significant difference between family medicine and internal medicine in the reasons for questions by components(P<0.001). In family medicine, the reasons were symptoms, complaints(66.9%), diagnoses, diseases(18.8%), treatment, procedure, medication(17.2%), and diagnostic, screening, prevention(5.5%). In internal medicine, the reasons for questions were symptoms, complaints(64.6%), diagnoses, diseases(21.1%), treatment, procedure, medication(9.3%), and test results(4.3%). There was a significant difference between family medicine and internal medicine in the questions by chapters(P<0.05). In family medicine, the questions about digestive system were 28 cases(15.5%), neurological system were 26 cases(14.4%), skin were 26 cases(14.4%), musculoskeletal system were 25 cases(13.8%), and unspecified were 25 cases(13.8%). In internal medicine, the questions about digestive system were 76 cases(47.2%), circulatory system were 21 cases(13.0%), and respiratory system were 15 cases(9.3%). The most common symptom was headache in family medicine and generalized abdominal pain in internal medicine. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the age distribution, the reasons for questions, and the contents of questions between family medicine and internal medicine.

Comparison of family medicine and internal medicine residents: fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodul

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration cytology is an effective and important diagnostic procedure to distinguish benign from malignant thyroid nodule. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology performed by the residents of family medicine and internal medicine. METHODS: Among patients who underwent fine needle aspiration cytology for differential diagnosis of thyroid nodule at the department of family medicine, Pusan National University Hospital from July 1996 to June 1998, we randomly selected 96 patients. We also selected 96 control patients at the department of internal medicine. We assessed the patients age, sex, accompanying symptoms, diagnostic procedures, pathologic results of fine needle aspiration cytology from the medical records and biopsy records. For statistical analysis, we used t-test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Mean age of 96 patients of family medicine was 44.4 years. Females were 89(92.7%) and males 7(7.3%). Age and sex distributions were not significantly different from that of internal medicine patients(p>0.05). Patients with thyroid nodule had underwent fine needle aspiration cytology(100.0%), thyroid function test(76.0%), thyroid scan(49.0%), and thyroid ultrasond(35.4%). There were more thyroid scans performed in the intemal medicine department, as there were more ultrasonograms done in the family medicine department(p0.05). Complications of aspiration were rare and not significantly different between the two departments(p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pathology results and complications of fine needle aspiration cytology performed by residents of family medicine and internal medicine were not significantly different.