Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica ; (12): 1582-1586, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-250591

ABSTRACT

This study aims to save cost of sampling for estimating the area under the amlodipine plasma concentration versus time curve in 24 hours (AUC(0-24 h)). Limited sampling strategy (LSS) models was developed and validated by mutiple regression model within 4 or fewer amlodipine concentration values. Absolute prediction error (APE), root of mean square error (RMSE) and visual predict check were used as criterion. The results of Jackknife validation showed that fifteen (9.4%) of the 160 LSS based on regression analysis were not within an APE of 15% by using one concentration-time point. 156 (97.5%), 159 (99.4%) and 160 (100%) of the 160 LSS model were capable of predicting within an APE 15% by using 2, 3, 4 points, separately. Limited sampling strategies have been developed and validated for estimating AUC(0-24 h) of amlodipine. The present study indicated that the implemention of both 5 mg and 10 mg dosage could enable accurate predictions of AUC(0-24 h) by the same LSS model. This study shows that 12, 4, 24, 2 h after administration are key sampling time points. The combination of (12, 4), (12, 4, 24) or (12, 4, 24, 2 h) might be chosen as sampling hours for predicting AUC(0-24 h) in practical application according to requirement.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Administration, Oral , Amlodipine , Blood , Pharmacokinetics , Antihypertensive Agents , Blood , Pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Asian People , Calcium Channel Blockers , Blood , Pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Regression Analysis , Sample Size , Vasodilator Agents , Blood , Pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL