Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal ; : 55-60, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-962097

ABSTRACT

@#Introduction: Elective implant removal following healed extremity fractures remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the reasons and outcomes of implant removal after uneventful healing of limb fractures. Materials and methods: This is a prospective single-centre observational cohort study. Patients who sustained upper or lower extremity fractures that were fixed and healed uneventfully were included in the study when they elected to remove the implants. Patients were followed for six months post-operatively. Outcomes were assessed with patient satisfaction, symptoms resolution, and complications. Results: A total of 43 patients were recruited from October 2016 to March 2019. Thirty-six patients (37 implants) were symptomatic. Pain and prominence were the most common complaints, present in 59.5% and 33.3% of patients, respectively. Cold weather pain was also not uncommon (19.0%). Pain improved in 91.3% of the patients who complained of pain. The 94.6% symptomatic patients had at least partial resolution of pre-operative symptoms. All the patients who completed follow-up were satisfied with the procedure. In two patients, there were broken and retained screws intra-operatively. Post-operative complication rate was 23.8%, although no major complications occurred. Conclusions: Implant removal after uneventful healing of extremity fractures is a safe procedure that conferred a predictable relief of symptoms and satisfactory outcomes in most.

2.
Indian J Cancer ; 2015 Dec; 52(7)Suppl_3: s168-s171
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-176763

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: MicroRNAs are important modulators of the cellular epithelial‑mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and are associated with metastasis in human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we tried to investigate the role of miR‑338‑3p in NSCLC cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Real‑time polymerase chain reaction was applied to quantify the expression levels of miR‑338‑3p, as well as EMT‑associated molecules in NSCLC cells. Wound healing and transwell assays were performed to evaluate the migration and invasion capacities, respectively. Dual‑luciferase reporter assay was finally performed to determine the targeting of zinc finger E‑box‑binding protein 2 (ZEB2) by miR‑338‑3p. RESULTS: We found that miR‑338‑3p was significantly reduced in NSCLC cell lines. Forced expression of miR‑338‑3p in A549 cells led to the suppression of migration/invasion capacity and inhibition of epithelial markers. In addition, we proved that miR‑338‑3p could directly target ZEB2. CONCLUSIONS: In general, we summarized that miR‑338‑3p could inhibit EMT and metastasis of human NSCLC cells, which probably via directly targeting ZEB2 expression.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL