ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified infusion(2-4 h infusion or continuous 24 h infusion)versus traditional infusion(0.5-1 h infusion)of meropenem in the treatment of severe infectious,and to provide evi-dence-based reference for clinic treatment. METHODS:Retrieved from Medline,CJFD,VIP database and Wanfang database, modified infusion(test group)versus traditional infusion(control group)of meropenem in the treatment of severe infections were collected,and Mata-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5.0 statistical software after extracting data and evaluating quality. RESULTS:A total of 13 studies were included,involving 1 012 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed the effective rate [RR=1.25,95%CI(1.10,1.43),P<0.001] and bacterial eradication rate [RR=1.25,95%CI(1.05,1.48),P=0.01] in test groups were sig-nificantly higher than those of control group,and there were no significant differences in the mortality rate [RR=0.74,95%CI (0.46,1.18),P=0.21] and incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.81,95%CI(0.48,1.39),P=0.45]. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with traditional infusion of meropenem,extended or continuous infusion can improve efficacy in the treatment of severe infections, with similar safety. Due to methodology limit of included studies,large-scale and high quality RCT are required for further valida-tion of the conclusions.