ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the features and advantages of the standardized residency training of urology in America and China, and to provide a reference for the improvement of the Chinese standardized residency training system.Methods:By studying the latest standardized training documents in China and the America, referring to the specific training rules of standardized training pilots (Shanghai and other cities), and the latest related researches, this article compares the differences between the Chinese and American standardized residency training systems from such five aspects as the source of urology training students, training objectives, training content, quality control and external environment, and tries to figure out the reasons for their formation.Results:There are many places in American standardized residency training system that can be referred, such as unifying the period of training system, strengthening the assessment of clinical capabilities of residents, focusing on the combination of clinical and scientific research, and improving the remuneration and practice environment of residents. At present, the quality and effectiveness of Chinese urology standardized residency training needs to be improved, especially the ability of independent diagnosis and surgical skills.Conclusion:By analyzing the differences of standardized residency training system between China and the United States, this article puts forward the following suggestions: a) to unify the educational system and establish a unified admission standard for urologists; b) to formulate a clear training goal and establish a national standardized assessment system; c) to improve the income level of urology residents, willing to establish a standardized residency training system that truly suits China's national conditions.