The role of capsule endoscopy combined with double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosis of small bowel diseases / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The diagnosis of small bowel diseases remains relatively inefficient using traditional imaging techniques. Capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are two novel methods of enteroscopy for examining the entire small bowel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of CE and DBE in patients with suspected small bowel diseases and to investigate the clinical significance of combined use of these two novel modalities.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two hundred and eighteen patients were evaluated for suspected small bowel disease, including 116 with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and 102 with obscure abdominal pain or chronic diarrhea. One hundred and sixty-five out of these patients underwent CE first and 53 patients underwent DBE (under anesthesia with propofol) first. DBE was recommended after negative or equivocal evaluation on CE and vise versa. Introduction of the endoscope during DBE was either orally or anally and the patients were referred for a second procedure using the opposite route several days later when no abnormalities were found on the first procedure. The detection rates, diagnostic accuracy, tolerance and frequency of adverse events of these two modalities were then analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Failure of the procedure was seen in one patient with CE and in two patients with DBE. Sixty-four DBE procedures were carried out in 51 patients; by the oral route in 34 cases, the anal route in 4 and both routes in 13 cases. The overall detection rate of small bowel diseases using CE (72.0%, 118/164) was superior to that with DBE (41.2%, 21/51); chi(2) = 16.1218, P < 0.0001. The diagnostic rate (51.8%, 85/164) was also higher than that with the latter procedure (39.2%, 20/51), but was not significantly different (chi(2) = 2.4771, P > 0.05). Furthermore, the detection rate of small bowel diseases in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding using CE (88.0%, 88/100) was superior to that of DBE (60.0%, 9/15); chi(2) = 7.7457, P = 0.0054. Lesions were detected by DBE in 1 out of 4 patients in whom CE had a negative result. Suspected findings by CE were confirmed by DBE combined with biopsy in 12 out of 15 patients. On the other hand, small bowel lesions were identified by CE in all 3 patients after negative evaluations by DBE. There were no severe complications during or after either of the two procedures.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The detection rate of small bowel diseases by CE is very high. CE should be selected for the initial diagnosis in patients with suspected small bowel diseases, especially in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. DBE appears to be inferior to CE in the diagnosis of small bowel diseases. However, it was shown that abnormalities could still be identified by DBE in patients with normal images or used to confirm suspected findings from CE. DBE can also serve as a good complementary approach after an initial diagnostic imaging using CE.</p>

Clinical application of wireless capsule endoscopy in pediatric and adolescent patients / 中华儿科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated in adults. However, its value in pediatric patients has not been well studied. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CE in pediatric patients with suspicious small bowel disorders.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifteen children and adolescents (less than 18 years) were referred to our study for suspected small bowel diseases from Aug. 2002 to May 2005. They aged from 3 to 18 years. Among them, 5 patients were less than 10 years old. The range of weight was from 17 to 83 kg and height was from 49 to 176 cm. Clinical indications included obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 12) and abdominal pain (n = 3). All the patients had normal results on upper and lower gastrointestinal examinations before they underwent CE. The procedures for capsule placement, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, the average time of the elimination of the capsule, capsule findings, and complications were recorded.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients described that the capsule was easy to swallow except 3 youngest children. Finally the capsule was delivered via gastroscopy with overtube for these three children under intravenous anesthesia. No capsule retention occurred during the study. Median recording time was (464 +/- 40) min. In 5 patients, the capsule did not pass the ileal valve by the end of the recording time. Median gastric transit time was (85 +/- 90) min. Median small bowel transit time was (283 +/- 106) min. The average time of the elimination of the capsule was (34.3 +/- 21.8) h. The detective yield of CE was 80%. These positive findings included Crohn's disease (5), hemangioma (2), angiodysplasia (2), Meckel diverticulum (1), polyp (1), and granulomatous lesions (1).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>CE was performed safely in pediatric patients after ingestion or endoscopic placement of the capsule. The high yield of abnormal findings was comparable to those of adult patients.</p>

Diagnostic effect of capsule endoscopy in small bowel tumors / 中华消化杂志

Objective To evaluate the effects of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and prognosis of small bowel tumors.Methods Three hundred and fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease during May 2002 to Feb.2007 were examined.The final diagnosis was confirmed pathologically.Results Thirty-three(9.22%) out of 358 patients were identified as small bowel tumors[male 14/female 19,mean age(51?17)years].Of them,23(69.70%) patients had malignant tumors and ten(30.30%) had benign tumors.Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were found in 26 cases,bleeding with abdominal pain in 2 cases,bleeding with diarrhea in 1 case,abdominal pain in 2 cases,abdominal pain with diarrhea in 1 case and vomiting in 1 case.All patients with benign tumors underwent surgery for their tumor.No further bleeding or abdominal pain after resection was found in all but one patient.Of the patients with malignant tumors,all expect two underwent surgery.Three patients accepted palliative surgery while eighteen patients received a curative resection.The locations of the tumor detected by capsule endoscopy were correlated well with the results of surgery.Conclusions Capsule endoscopy promises a higher diagnostic yield in small bowel tumors. h may improve the diagnosis of small bowel tumors and alter management thoroughly.

The cost analysis of capsule endoscopy in diagnosing small bowel bleeding / 中华消化杂志

Objective To analyze the cost of capsule endoscopy in diagnosing small bowel bleeding and to compare it with traditional diagnostic methods.Methods The patients suspected with small bowel bleeding were divided into group A(n=58,collected during 1998 to 2005)diagnosed with traditional processes and group B (n=93,collected during 2002 to January 2005)diagnosed with capsule endoscopy.The diagnostic yield,specific treatments,examination costs and other accumulated costs of two groups was compared.The examination cost ratio and the integration cost ratio were evaluated.The sensitivity analysis was performed.Results The diagnostic yield of small bowel bleeding in group A and group B were 22.4%(13/58) and 86%(80/93),respectively.The total of examination costs were 133 750 RMB and 790 500 RMB,respectively.The examination costs in group B(RMB 9881.3/each) was slightly lower than group A(RMB 10 288.5/each).Furthermore,as the diagnostic yield of group B was significantly higher than group A(P=0.001).The specific treatments based on the results of the diagnosis was 37.4% higher in group B(49.5%) than group A(12.1%).That means the cost of repeat- ed consultations,emergencies room visit,examinations,supporting treatments and hospitalizations in group B were significantly decreased.After the adjustment,the cost in group B(RMB 9881/patient) was lower than group A(16 361.5 RMB in one month—97 424.0 over 5 years/patient).The total cost of each patient in group A was 6480.2—87 542.7 RMB more than group B,which represented 1.7—9.9 folds increase.Conclusions The patients who suspected with small bowel bleeding and had a negative results of gastroscopy and colonoscopy were recommended to have capsule endoscopy which yields early diagnosis and less cost.