Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 876-879, 2008.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-381976

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the first-line and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs resistance of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( M. TB) isolates and the prevalence of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in hospital-base TB patients in Shandong province, China. Methods Absolute concentration method based on egg medium were examined for drug-resistance of M. TB strains to 4 first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs (INH, RFP, SM, and EMB) and 5 second-line drugs (FQ,CPM,AMK,and PAS).Results 1021 isolates were obtained from clinical TB patients at Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital during November 2004 to April 2007. Of those, 32 strains ( 3.1% ) were identified to Mycobacterium other than tuberculosis. Among 989 M. TB complexe isolates, the general resistance rate to first-line drugs were 32. 3% (95% CI:28.7% - 35.8% ), 107 isolates ( 10. 8% ) were found to be MDR-TB. According to the revised Global XDR-TB Task Force definition, a total of 20( 18. 7% ) MDR-TB patients met criteria for XDR-TB. All XDR-TB patients were previously treated pulmonary tuberculosis cases. Conclusions The prevalence of resistant to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis was very serious, and high prevalence of XDR-TB in hospital-base patients was found in high-level The study showed that it is important to successively survey the anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in clinical laboratory.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12)1991.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-518793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To discuss the economic effectiveness of different therapeutic schemes for the same disease.METH_ODS:104 cases of female's urogenital tract infections of gonococcus combining chlamydia were randomly divided into five gro_ups,which were given ofloxacin(A),levofloxacin hydrochloride(B),clarithromycin(C),azithromycin(D)and ceftriaxone+erythromycin(E)respectively.Using pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness analysis method,the five schemes were compared.RES_ULTS:The costs of the five schemes were RMB 351,390,474,633 and 666 yuans,respectively.The ratios between cost and effectiveness were 5.7,4.5,5.5,7.6 and 8.3 in term of curative rate and 4.9,4.1,5.2,7.1 and 7.8 in term of effective rate respectively.CONCLUSION: B and C schemes are the best ones.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL