ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the 10-year survival outcome and failure patterns for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT),aiming to provide reference for optimized treatment for NPC.Methods Clinical data of 866 patients with NPC receiving IMRT from January 2001 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.Univariate analysis was carried out by log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model.Results The median follow-up time was 132 months.The 10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS),distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS),progression-free survival (PFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were 92.0％,83.4％,75.7％ and 78.6％,respectively.A total of 210 patients died including 124 patients (59.0％) from distant metastasis,which was the primary cause of death,and 47 (22.3％) from local regional recurrence.Independent negative factors of DSS included age＞50 years (P=0.00),LDH ≥ 245 IU/L (P=0.00),Hb＜ 120 g/L (P=0.01),T2-T4 staging (P=0.00),N1-N3 staging (P=0.00) and GTV-nx＞20 cm3(P=0.00).The 10-year LRFS,DMFS and DSS of stage Ⅱ NPC patients did not significantly differ after IMRT alone and chemoradiotherapy (P=0.83,0.22,0.23).For patients with stage Ⅲ NPC,the 10-year LRFS and DSS in the chemoradiotherapy arm were significantly higher than those in the IMRT alone (P=0.01,0.01),whereas no statistical significance was observed in the DMFS between two groups (P=0.14).The overall survival of stage Ⅳa+Ⅳb NPC patients is relatively poor.Conclusions IMRT can improve the long-term survival of NPC patients.Distant metastasis is the primary failure pattern.Patients with stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ NPC can obtain satisfactory survival outcomes after IMRT alone.The addition of chemotherapy can further enhance the LRFS and DSS of stage Ⅲ NPC patients.However,the optimal therapeutic strategy remains to be urgently investigated for stage a+ Ⅳb NPC patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a post?treatment prognostic score model for newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and to investigate the feasibility of stratified therapy. Methods A total of 263 eligible patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 2002 to 2010 were enrolled as subjects. The primary tumor was treated with conventional radiotherapy, three?dimensional conformal radiotherapy, or intensity?modulated radiotherapy, and radiation areas included nasopharyngeal tumor and cervical lymphatic drainage region. The metastatic bone tumor was mainly treated with conventional external radiotherapy, while the metastatic liver or lung tumor was mainly treated with surgical resection, radiotherapy, or radiofrequency ablation. The first?line therapy for most of patients was cisplatin?based combination chemotherapy. Factors including the general characteristics, tumor status, and therapy for patients were involved in multivariate analysis, and a prognostic model was established based on the n value (HR=en ) of the prognostic factors. Results The factors influencing the overall survival (OS) in patients were a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) not higher than 70(P= 0?? 00), multiple organ metastases (P=0?? 00), combination with liver metastasis (P= 0?? 00), a number of metastases not less than 2(P= 0?? 00), a level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) higher than 245 IU/ L (P= 0?? 00), a number of chemotherapy cycles ranging between 1 and 3( P= 0?? 00), a poor response for metastatic tumor ( stable disease or progressive disease)(P= 0?? 00), and primary tumor not treated with radiotherapy (P= 0?? 01). Based on the prognostic score, patients were divided into low?risk group (0?1?? 5 points), intermediate?risk group (2?? 0?6?? 5 points), and high?risk group (≥7?? 0 points), and the 5?year OS rates in the three groups were 59?? 0%, 25?? 1%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions The prognostic score model based on the KPS, serum level of LDH, multiple organ metastases, combination with liver metastasis, and number of metastases can effectively predict the survival in patients. Active treatment including at least 4 chemotherapy cycles and radiotherapy for primary tumor can prolong the survival time of patients in the low?and intermediate?risk groups. However, patients in the high?risk group were mainly treated with palliative radiotherapy due to no improvement in the survival by radiotherapy for primary tumor.