ABSTRACT
@#Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of Ivor-Lewis via hand-sewn purse-string approach and purse-string forceps approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy for middle and lower esophageal cancer, and to discuss the safety and feasibility of hand-sewn purse-string anastomosis technique for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE). Methods The clinical data of 151 patients undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophageal cancer surgery from January 2014 to January 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of purse string making, the patients were divided into a purse-string forceps group including 49 males and 16 females with a mean age of 67.98±7.07 years ranging from 51 to 80 years treated with forceps to make purse-string and a handcraft group including 61 males and 25 females with a mean age of 67.76±8.18 years ranging from 52 to 83 years using hand-sewn way. The perioperative data of two two groups were compared. Results The purse-string making time and postoperative total volume of chest drainage were less in the handcraft group than those in the purse-string forceps group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in hemorrhage during operation, the operation duration or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). There was also no statistical difference between the two groups in the rate of anastomotic or gastric tube fistula, anastomotic stenosis, pulmonary infection or incision infection (P>0.05). Conclusion In minimally invasive esophagectomy for middle-lower section, MIILE by hand-sewn purse-string is as safe as purse-string forceps, with no more complications, needing no professional equipments, and easy to learn, master and promote.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the femoral arterial preclosure by purse-string suture for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods From January 2013 to September 2016, TEVAR was performed on 40 patients with Standford type B aortic dissection. There were 34 males and 6 females aged 57.9±10.4 years. According to the surgical procedure, they were divided into a purse-string group (20 patients, 16 males, 4 females, aged 58.1±10.3 years), in which the patients received femoral arterial preclosure by purse-string suture and a convention group (20 patients, 18 males, 2 females, aged 57.7±10.8 years), in which the patients underwent conventional femoral cutdown. The outcomes and complications of two groups were evaluated. Results There was no in-hospital death and no paraplegia event. There was significantly shorter operation time (70.4±24.0 min vs. 100.8±35.6 min, P=0.003) and less blood loss (39.5±29.8 ml vs. 83.5±86.5 ml, P=0.038) in the purse-string group than those in the convention group. Femoral artery stenosis was observed in 3 patients (15.0%) in the convention group and none in the purse-string group during the follow-up of 1-36 (17.2±11.5) months with no statistical difference (P=0.231). Conclusion Using the femoral arterial preclosure by purse-string suture for TEVAR can save operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and decrease the approach-associated complications.