ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of orotracheal intubation with video intubationscope and visual laryngoscope in obese patients. Methods 60 ASA I or II obese patients, BMI >30 kg/m2, aged 22 ~ 60 years, underwent elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation were randomly divided into two groups: the video intubationscope group (Group V) and the visual laryngoscope group (group K), 30 cases in each. Cormark-Lehane grade (C-L classification), tracheal intubation time, total intubation attempts, success rate of tracheal intubation and complications of tracheal intubation were recorded. Results Good glottic exposure view (C-L classification) was achieved in the two groups (P > 0.05), there were no significant difference in tracheal intubation time, the total success rate and the one-time success rate of tracheal intubation between the V and K groups [(24.4 ± 11.6) s vs (22.3 ± 13.2) s, 100.0% vs 100.0%, 90.0% vs 86.7%] (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complications of tracheal intubation between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Video intubationscope and visual laryngoscope are suitable for tracheal intubation in obese patients, and has an advantage of good glottis exposure view, rapid intubation, great successful rate and few complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of single operation video intubationscope assisted by disposable mouthpiece in orotracheal intubation. Methods 100 patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups with 50 cases in each: mouthpiece group (group M): single operation video intubationscope assisted by disposable mouthpiece in orotracheal intubation was performed; control group (group C): Video intubationscope oral intubation assisted by helper were applied. The BP, MAP, HR and SpO2 in the two groups were recorded during intubation. The success rate of intubation, duration of glottis exposure, duration of intubation and complications were recorded. Results Oral-tracheal intubation with video intubationscope were successfully completed for all 100 pa-tients, SpO2 during intubation in two groups was maintained above 95.0%, there was no significant hemodynamic changes in two groups. There were no significant difference in the one-time success rate of intubation, duration of glottis exposure and duration of intubation between group M and group C [92.0%vs 88.0%, (13.0 ±7.0) vs (14.0 ±8.0), (20.0 ± 10.0) vs (21.0 ± 11.0), > 0.05]. No significant complications were reported. Conclusion Compared with video intubationscope oral intubation assisted by helper, single operation video intubationscope assisted by dis-posable mouthpiece in orotracheal intubation also is feasible and effective without needing assistant, it is a simple and convenient technology worthy of application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in simulated cervical spine immobilization. Methods Sixty patients, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ , between 19 and 68 years old, underwent general anesthesia requiring oro-tracheal intubation, were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using video intubationscope (group V) or Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M), 30 cases in each. Each patient was provided mannal in-line axial stabilization of the head and neck by an experienced assistant. The following data were recorded and analyzed: glottic exposure time, Cormark-Lehane grade (C-L classification), tracheal intubation time, total intubation attempts, manoeuvre needed to aid tracheal intubation, failure for tracheal intubation, one-time success rate of tracheal intubation and total success rate of tracheal intubation, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before induction of anesthesia, before intubation, at glottic exposure, at intubation, 1 and 3 min after intubation, and complications. Results Compared with group M, better glottic exposure view (C-L classification) was achieved in group V (P 0.05) and were significantly increased at T3~T5 (P < 0.05); compared with group M, MAP at T2~T4 in group V were significantly lower (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, HR in group V were no significantly changed at T2~T5, HR in group M were significantly increased at T2~T4 (P < 0.05), and significantly higher than that in group V at the same time point (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization, Video intubationscope could provide better view of glottic exposure, decrease the difficulty of intubation and increase the success rate of intubation, have less complications and influence on patient’s hemodynamics.