Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Clinics ; 71(3): 179-184, Mar. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-778992

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis was designed to elucidate whether preoperative signal intensity changes could predict the surgical outcomes of patients with cervical spondylosis myelopathy on the basis of T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging images. We searched the Medline database and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for this purpose and 10 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were identified. In total, 650 cervical spondylosis myelopathy patients with (+) or without (-) intramedullary signal changes on their T2-weighted images were examined. Weighted mean differences and 95g% confidence intervals were used to summarize the data. Patients with focal and faint border changes in the intramedullary signal on T2 magnetic resonance imaging had similar Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery ratios as those with no signal changes on the magnetic resonance imaging images of the spinal cord did. The surgical outcomes were poorer in the patients with both T2 intramedullary signal changes, especially when the signal changes were multisegmental and had a well-defined border and T1 intramedullary signal changes compared with those without intramedullary signal changes. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging including T1 and T2 imaging can thus be used to predict postoperative recovery in cervical spondylosis myelopathy patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spinal Cord Diseases/pathology , Spondylosis/pathology , Postoperative Period , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Preoperative Care/methods , Recovery of Function , Spinal Cord Diseases/rehabilitation , Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery , Spondylosis/rehabilitation , Spondylosis/surgery
2.
Clinics ; 70(10): 714-719, Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-762964

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of an extramedullary or intramedullary tibial cutting guide leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 350 knees was performed. For the mechanical axis, frontal tibial component angle and tibial slope, there were no significant differences in the mean values or the number of outliers (±3°) between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups. A reduced tourniquet time was associated with the intramedullary guide. No significant difference in the complication rate was noted between the two groups. Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary tibial alignment was more accurate in facilitating the tibial cut. Use of an intramedullary guide results in a shorter tourniquet time and exhibits a similar complication rate as the extramedullary guide.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Tibia/surgery , Bias , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Tourniquets , Tibia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL