Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Cancer Research and Clinic ; (6): 826-830, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-958943

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the application value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in tumor staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:The clinical data of 40 patients diagnosed with stage Ⅲ AEG and treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2016 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University were retrospectively analyzed. EUS was used to perform preoperative tumor staging after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy to evaluate the therapeutic effect, and the consistency between EUS and postoperative pathological staging was analyzed.Results:In 40 AEG patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the EUS staging was stage yp-uT 2 in 12 cases, stage yp-uT 3 in 18 cases, and stage yp-uT 4 in 10 cases. The postoperative pathological staging was stage pT 1 in 2 cases, stage pT 2 in 14 cases, stage pT 3 in 12 cases, and stage pT 4 in 12 cases. Taking postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the accuracy of EUS for T staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 62.5%, and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage T 2 were 58.3%, 50.0% and 80.8%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage T 3 were 61.1%, 91.7% and 75.0%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage T 4 were 70.0%, 58.3% and 89.3%, respectively. The Kappa value of the consistency test between yp-uT staging and pT staging was 0.453. The EUS staging of lymph nodes was stage yp-uN 0 in 15 cases, stage yp-uN 1 in 10 cases, stage yp-uN 2 in 10 cases, and stage yp-uN 3 in 5 cases. The postoperative pathological staging was stage pN 0 in 18 cases, stage pN 1 in 7 cases, stage pN 2 in 7 cases, and stage pN 3 in 8 cases. Taking postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the accuracy rate of EUS for N staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 57.5%, and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of EUS for stage N 0 were 73.3%, 61.1% and 81.8%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage N 1 were 50.0%, 71.4% and 84.8%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage N 2 were 40.0%, 57.1% and 81.8%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for stage N 3 were 60.0%, 37.5% and 93.8%, respectively. The Kappa value of the consistency test between yp-uN staging and pN staging was 0.409. Conclusions:EUS is not accurate for T staging in patients with stage Ⅲ AEG after neoadjuvant therapy, but has high sensitivity for stage T 3 and high specificity for stage T 4. EUS has low sensitivity for N staging in patients with stage Ⅲ AEG after neoadjuvant therapy, but has high specificity for stage N 3.

2.
Cancer Research and Clinic ; (6): 103-106, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-712774

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the application value of surgical operation combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal carcinoma in phase Ⅱ and Ⅲ and to evaluate the effect of surgical resection. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed from January 2012 to January 2017, including 70 cases of middle and lower rectal carcinoma in phase ⅡandⅢin the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University.Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy before operation was applied.Neoadjuvant radiotherapy: total dose 50 Gy, 2.0 Gy for once, 5 times per week, 5 weeks in total, the radiation field 5 wild for pelvic irradiation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: XELOX (oxaliplatin, capecitabine) / FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil) was used for synchronous chemotherapy. After radiotherapy, the patients received surgery in 6-8 weeks. All the operations were performed according to the total mesorectum excision (TME) specification.Results A total of 70 patients underwent neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.The adverse effect rate was 15.71 % (11/70) of gradeⅠand 7.14 % (5/70) of gradeⅡ. No gradeⅢandⅣadverse reactions occurred. The tumor stage of 94.29 % (66/70) patients reduced. The TNM stage of the postoperation was decreased compared with that before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (χ 2= 7.846, P < 0.05). Tumor resection rate was 94.29 % (66/70). Conclusion Surgical operation combined with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy before operation for middle and lower rectal carcinoma in phase ⅡandⅢhas a favorable efficacy and safety,which can alleviate the tumor staging and increase the eradication rate of tumors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL