Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ; (12): 659-664, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-888334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the feasibility and clinical effects of arthroscopic treatment for the calcific tendinitis at soft tissues around hip.@*METHODS@#A total of 16 patients diagnosed as the calcific tendinitis at soft tissues around hip from May 2013 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All the 16 patients received arthroscopic procedures. There were 10 males and 6 females with an average age of 35 to 63 (44.50±6.67) years old and 9 left hips, 6 right hips were involved. The course of disease were 1 to 8(3.18±1.97) days. Clinical effects were evaluated with visual analogue scale(VAS), modified Harris hip scores (HHS), nonarthritic hip score (NAHS) and imaging examinations before operation, 1 day after operation and the final follow-up.@*RESULTS@#All 16 patients successfully finished the arthroscopic procedures in 0.5 to 1.2 (0.75±0.21) hours. Primary healing of incision were obtained without any complications of infection, wound hematocele and neurovascular injury. All 16 patients received an average postoperative follow-up of 6 to 12 (9.6±2.3) months. Before operation, the VAS were 7.88±0.72, modified HHS were 29.25±3.23, NAHS were 27.42±3.08. The 1st day postoperative VAS were 2.19±0.66, modified HHS were 82.56± 5.64, NAHS were 82.11±2.94, all the difference were statistically significant between before and 1 day after operation (@*CONCLUSION@#Arthroscopic treatment for the calcific tendinitis at soft tissues around hip is effective.It has advantages of minimal invasive, rapid pain relief, rapid hip joint function recovery and definite clinical effects.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arthroscopy , Follow-Up Studies , Hip/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tendinopathy/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ; (12): 217-221, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-690011

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare technique and clinical effect of arthroscopic and conventional sectional therapy for the treatment of ischial tuberosity cyst.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From May 2014 and September 2016, 49 patients with symptomatic ischial tuberosity cyst were randomized divided into arthroscopic group and conventional section group by envelope method. There were 24 patients in arthroscopic group, including 16 males and 8 females aged from 42 to 81years old with an average age of (64.1±9.3) years old;the courses of disease ranged from 2 to 36 months with an average of (17.0±9.1) months;treated with removing cyst wall under arthroscopic and build artificial lacuna around cyst. There were 25 patients in conventional section group, including 11 males and 14 females aged from 47 to 79 years old with an average of (61.2±10.6) years old; the courses of disease ranged from 4 to 36 months with an average of (17.5±8.5) months;treated with cutting off lump with transverse incision. Operative time, blood loss, fluid volume, hospital stays and postoperative complication were observed and compared, VAS score were applied to evaluate pain degree.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Forty-nine patients were followed up from 6 to 18 months with an average of (11.3±3.3) months. In conventional group, 2 patients occurred incision infection, 1 case reoccurred. All patients in arthroscopic group were healed at stage I. Operative time, blood loss, fluid volume, and hospital stays in arthroscopic group were (54.7±7.7) min, (20.8±3.5) ml, (20.3±5.6) ml, (2.8±0.6) d respectively and better than that of conventional group(71.8±8.8) min, (67.3±12.0) ml, (103.6±20.3) ml, (7.8±2.9) d. Postoperative VAS score in arthroscopic group on the first day, seventh days and first month were 2.6±0.7, 0.5±0.6, 0.3±0.5, and significantly lower than that of conventional group 6.0±0.7, 3.0±1.0, 1.1±1.0 respectively(<0.05). There were no statistical difference in postoperative complications between two groups(>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Compared with conventional group, arthroscopic for ischial tuberosity cyst has advantages of minimal invasive, less blood loss during perioperative period, less pain degree after surgery, safety and rapid recovery. But arthroscopic skills are needed for surgeons. It should be recommended in clinical practice.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arthroscopy , Bone Cysts , General Surgery , Case-Control Studies , Operative Time , Pelvic Bones , Pathology , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL