Transcatheter arterial infusion of anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody pembrolizumab combined with temozolomide or nab-paclitaxel in patient with primary anorectal malignant melanoma: Four case reports

Primary anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is an extremely rare but aggressive tumor. We assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) with anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab at a dosage of 100 mg with 0.9% NaCl at a volume of 100 mL administered over a 30-min period every 3 weeks, combined with temozolomide or albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in four patients with ARMM. Temozolomide was administered orally once per day at a dosage of 200 mg/m2/d for five consecutive days about every 4 weeks. Nab-paclitaxel was administered at a dosage of 200mg/m2/d once about every 3 weeks. Among four patients with a median follow-up of 8.9 months, two cases showed Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) amplification. Case 1 with Stage II ARMM showed pathological complete response after four cycles of TAI with pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel. Case 4 was at Stage II and showed stable disease consistently throughout the treatment. Case 2 was at stage II and Case 3 was at stage III, and they showed partial response after four or three cycles, respectively, of TAI with pembrolizumab combined with temozolomide. No Grades 3–4 adverse reactions were observed. Therefore, a combination of TAI with pembrolizumab and temozolomide or with nab-paclitaxel appears to be a promising option for treating ARMM. However, multicenter clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this procedure

Melanoma liver metastases with special imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging after microwave ablations: How to evaluate technical efficacy?

Purpose: To evaluate the technical feasibility of microwave ablation (MWA) for melanoma liver metastases with persistent high signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Seven patients with 22 target melanoma liver metastases who underwent MWA treatment were included. All procedure-related complications were observed and recorded. One month after MWA, the imaging features of treated liver metastases and ablation zones with different MRI sequences were reviewed to evaluate technique efficacy. To verify the correctness of the evaluation, MRI scans during patient follow-up were reviewed and compared with images before MWA to analyze changes in treated liver metastases and ablation zones. Results: All ablations were performed successfully, and there were no procedure-related major complications. After ablation, according to MRI T1-weighted pre-contrast or contrast sequences, the persistence of high signals from the treated lesions was noted inside the ablation zones of 19 lesions. Among these 19 lesions, 17 were completely covered by the ablation zones and were considered successfully treated, whereas two lesions were not completely covered and were considered unsuccessfully treated. Three lesions could not be detected on any MRI sequence after ablation and were also considered successfully treated. Finally, MRI scans during patient follow-up care verified these evaluations. Conclusion: MWA is a technically feasible option for melanoma liver metastases with special imaging features on MRI