ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:As the bone and marrow tissue have very special structure, it is difficult to simultaneously display the bone with tough hard tissue and bone marrow tissues containing various immature hematopoietic cel s in the conventional process of pathological section preparation. OBJECTIVE:To choose the best decalcifying solution that cannot only completely remove the calcium in the bone tissue but also protect the structure of bone marrow tissues and cel s from damage. METHODS:Bone marrow tissues from the long bone of dogs were randomly divided into four groups. Under the same conditions, the bone marrow tissues were decalcified with 14%formaldehyde saline solution of nitric acid (group A), 14%nitric acid solution (group B), 20%A saline solution of hydrochloric acid formaldehyde (group C) and 20%A hydrochloric acid aqueous solution (group D). Decalcified time was recorded, fol owed by routine dehydration, section, hematoxylin-eosin staining and microscopic observation. Pathological section quality and hematoxylin-eosin staining were compared among the four groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Group A had the best sections and hematoxylin-eosin staining, strongest decalcified ability, shortest decalcified time and minimum damage to the bone marrow. Group B had the worst results of section and hematoxylin-eosin staining, in which, the bone tissues were loose and became yel ow and the bone marrow tissue were damaged greatly, and the decalcified effect was worse. Group C was worse than group A in decalcified ability, damage degree, section quality and hematoxylin-eosin staining results. Group D also had a better result of section and hematoxylin-eosin staining as wel as exhibited uniform decalcification effect and less damage to the bone marrow, which was ranked between group B and group C. Al the four kinds of decalcifying solutions have a good decalcification ability, but the section quality and hematoxylin-eosin staining results rank as fol ows:Group A>Group C>Group D>Group B. Taken together, 14%formaldehyde saline solution of nitric acid is ideal for the clinical preparation of pathological sections.
ABSTRACT
The in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer technique has been widely applied in human insemination. The rate of successful insemination is gradual y rising, and the in-vitro fertilization directly determine the insemination outcome. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the difference between the two common using insemination methods, microdrop and open, in in-vitro fertilization and embryo development. METHODS:A randomized study was conducted to compare microdrop and open insemination methods among non-male factor patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. A total of 1 175 cases were enrol ed in the research. There were 573 cases in the microdrop group, and 602 cases in open insemination group. The fertilization rate and embryo development in the two groups were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The fertilization failure rate [total fertilization failure rate+low fertilization rate (0.05). The open insemination method is a simple insemination method with a lower fertilization failure rate. As the fertilization is a highly complicated process involving many extrinsic and intrinsic factors, further study is needed to confirm the effects of the two insemination methods on in-vitro fertilization outcome.