Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 3260-3262, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-661314

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure for rad-ical nephrectomy. Methods The clinical data of 140 cases underwent retroperitoneal aparoscopic radical nephrec-tomy from August 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them ,87 cases were controlled by procedure for radical nephrectomy ,53 cases were treated with Non-procedural for radical nephrectomy. The peri-operative information parameters of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results All of the 140 cases were operated under laparoscopy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the basic condition and tumor location(P>0.05). Retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure in the operation time ,intraoperative bleed-ing,peritoneal rupture rate,blood transfusion,complete tumor resection and postoperative drainage were better than non-procedural for radical nephrectomy ,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01). All patients were followed up for 1 to 3 years without recurrence and metastasis. Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pro-cedure for radical nephrectomy is significant ,worthy of clinical application and promotion.

2.
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 3260-3262, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-658395

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure for rad-ical nephrectomy. Methods The clinical data of 140 cases underwent retroperitoneal aparoscopic radical nephrec-tomy from August 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them ,87 cases were controlled by procedure for radical nephrectomy ,53 cases were treated with Non-procedural for radical nephrectomy. The peri-operative information parameters of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results All of the 140 cases were operated under laparoscopy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the basic condition and tumor location(P>0.05). Retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure in the operation time ,intraoperative bleed-ing,peritoneal rupture rate,blood transfusion,complete tumor resection and postoperative drainage were better than non-procedural for radical nephrectomy ,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01). All patients were followed up for 1 to 3 years without recurrence and metastasis. Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pro-cedure for radical nephrectomy is significant ,worthy of clinical application and promotion.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL