Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 166-171, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-322088

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the differences in the gene expression profiles of the peripheral blood immune cells between liver and kidney transplantation recipients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A dataset containing the gene expression profiles of 27 liver transplantation recipients and 25 kidney transplantation recipients (from GSE22229 and GSE28842, respectively) was downloaded from the GEO database. By combining gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and biological network analysis of the differentially expressed genes using Cytoscape software, we analyzed the core genes closely related to liver or kidney transplantations.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>GSEA identified 20 highly overlapping genes for liver transplantation and another 20 for kidney transplantation using leading edge analysis. Fourteen hub nodes (gene) for liver transplantation and 13 for kidney transplantation were identified by cytoscape software using interaction network analysis. Five core genes related to liver transplantation and 5 to kidney transplantation were obtained by integrating GSEA and biological network analysis.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Controlling the transcription and translation of the genes of the peripheral blood immune cells is the main immune regulation mechanism in liver transplantation recipients, but in the recipients of kidney transplantation, the protein interaction network plays a more prominent role. Energy metabolism and functional regulation of the immune cells are closely related. The core genes in peripheral blood immune cells related to liver or kidney transplantation may play key roles in regulating immune functions.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Gene Regulatory Networks , Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Transcriptome
2.
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation ; (12): 141-143, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-390266

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the expression level of Tim-3,the marker of activated T_H 1 cells.in T lymphocytes in different sites from recipients with acute rejection.Methods The model of cervical heterotopic heart transplantation was established in mice Two groups were get up:the isograft group(C57BL/6→C57BL/6) and the allograft group (Balb/c→C57BL/6).Lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood,spleens,draining lymph nodes and grafts 3 or 6 days after transplantation.The expression of TIM-3 in CD4~+ and CD8~+ T subsets was detected by flow cytometry.Results There was no significant difference in Tim-3~+/CD4~+ and Tim-3~+/CD8~+ ratio in peripheral blood or spleens between two groups.As compared with the isograft group,the proportion of Tirn-3~+/CD4~+ cells was slightly elevated in draining lymph node(P<0.05),but the percentage of Tim-3~+/CD4~+ cells had no significant change between 3 days and 6 days in the allograft group(P>0.05).The expression of Tim-3 in CD4~+ and CD8~+ of graft infiltrating T cells was obviously increased in allograft group(P<0.01),and it was significantly (P<0.01) up-regulated on the 6th day as compared with that on the 3rd day.Conclusion The dynamic changes of Tim-3 expression in T lymphocytes in draining lymph node and graft were correlated with the progresston oi acute rejection in mice.

3.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 585-91, 2009.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-634662

ABSTRACT

To identify acute renal allograft rejection biomarkers in human serum, two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) and reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) followed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) were used. Serum samples from renal allograft patients and normal volunteers were divided into three groups: acute rejection (AR), stable renal function (SRF) and normal volunteer (N). Serum samples were firstly processed using Multiple Affinity Removal Column to selectively remove the highest abundance proteins. Differentially expressed proteins were analyzed using 2-D DIGE. These differential protein spots were excised, digested by trypsin, and identified by RP-HPLC-ESI/MS. Twenty-two differentially expressed proteins were identified in serum from AR group. These proteins included complement C9 precursor, apolipoprotein A-IV precursor, vitamin D-binding protein precursor, beta-2-glycoprotein 1 precursor, etc. Vitamin D-binding protein, one of these proteins, was confirmed by ELISA in the independent set of serum samples. In conclusion, the differentially expressed proteins as serum biomarker candidates may provide the basis of acute rejection noninvasive diagnosis. Confirmed vitamin D-binding protein may be one of serum biomarkers of acute rejection. Furthermore, it may provide great insights into understanding the mechanisms and potential treatment strategy of acute rejection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL