Comparing the results of pathologic diagnosis of mesothelioma between Chinese and Japanese experts / 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the results of pathological diagnosis of 41 patients with malignant mesothelioma between Chinese and Japanese experts, and to provide a basis for the standard for diagnosis of mesothelioma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The medical information and tissue samples of 41 patients with malignant mesothelioma were collected in a hospital in Zhejiang Province from 2003 to 2010. The expression levels of calretinin, Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (WT1), podoplanin (D2-40), cytokeratins (CK5/6, AE1/AE3, and CAM5.2), epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, BerEP4, MOC31, thyroid transcription factor-1, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor in tumor tissues were measured using immunohistochemical staining by Japanese experts, and the pathological classification and diagnosis were made. The results of diagnosis, pathological classification, immunohistochemical marker selection, and slide review were compared between Chinese and Japanese experts.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Twenty-nine (70.7%) cases were diagnosed as mesothelioma by Japanese experts, among whom 12 (41.4%) cases were pleura mesothelioma, and 17 (58.6%) cases were peritoneal mesothelioma. Ten (24.4%) cases were confirmed without mesothelioma, and 2 (4.9%) cases were not confirmed due to insufficient information. Thirty-two (78.0%) cases were diagnosed as mesothelioma by Chinese experts, among whom 8 (25.0%) cases were pleura mesothelioma, and 24 (75.0%) cases were peritoneal mesothelioma. One (2.4%) case was confirmed without mesothelioma, and 8 (19.5%) cases were not confirmed. There were significant differences in the results of diagnosis between Chinese and Japanese experts. However, their pathological classifications of mesothelioma were similar. Significant differences in immunohistochemical marker selection and slide review were also found between Chinese and Japanese experts.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The diagnostic skills of those pathological experts in this hospital remain to be further improved for mesothelioma diagnosis. A panel of immunohistochemical markers including at least 2 mesothelioma-positive and 2 mesothelioma-negative markers are recommended for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.</p>

Significance of micro RNA-21 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma / 白血病·淋巴瘤

ObjectiveTo investigate the expression of miR-21 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)and normal lymph tissues and its potential relevance with clinicopathological characteristics.MethodsThe expression levels of miR-21 in 50 primary DLBCL and 12 normal lymph node tissue specimens were examined by TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction.The expression of bcl-2 and p53 was detected by immunohistochemistry staining. ResultsThe expression of miR-21 was significantly higher in tumor tissues than that in normal tissues, in GCB subtypes higher than in non-GCB subtypes. And it was negatively correlated with bcl-2(P=0.020),while positively correlated with p53(P=0.022). Up-regulated miR-21 expression was low in three years of survival rate. ConclusionMiR-21 may indicate a more aggressive phenotype and serve as a molecular prognostic marker in DLBCL. High-expression of miR-21 is a key feature that is correlated with cell proliferation in DLBCL.miR-21 may have some guiding significance in prognosis.bcl-2,p53 is possibly one of the targets of miR-21 in DLBCL.

Expression and relationship of MMP-2 and COX-2 in bladder transitional cell carcinoma / 肿瘤研究与临床

Objective To evaluate the level of MMP-2 and COX-2 Protein in bladder transitional cell carcinoma tissue and explore their relationships. Methods A total of 42 patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma, including Ta-T1 (n=18), T2-T4 (n=24), G1(n=12), G2 (n=19), G3 (n=11), metastasis (n=26) and without metastasis (n=16), were enrolled in the study. Eight normal bladder tissues were selected as control group. Western blotting was performed todetect the mRNA level of MMP-2 and COX-2. Results The relative COX-2 protein level of Ta-T1 (0.729±0.458), T2-T4 (1.248±0.425), G1 (0.61±0.486), G2 (1.055±0.406), G3 (1.422±0.341) were all higher than that of the control group significantly (0.31±0.149, t = 3.56, 4.13; F = 5.98, P ＜0.05). The relative MMP-2 protein level of Ta-T1 (0.844±0.345), T2-T4 (1.458±0.463), G1 (0.971 ±0.370), G2(1.445±0.378), G3 (1.755±0.387) were all higher than that of the control group (0.460±0.213, t = 3.91, 4.83;F = 6.35, P ＜0.05). The COX-2 and MMP-2 protein level in tumor tissues with and without metastasis were 1.246±0.426 vs 0.668±0.421, 1.430±0.461 vs 0.814±0.341, t = 5.89, 6.27, P ＜0.01, respectively. The level of COX-2 protein was positively correlated with MMP-2 positively (r =0.48, P ＜0.01). Conclusion MMP-2 and COX-2 protein are highly expressed in bladder transitional cell carcinoma tissue and their expression is positively correlated with the malignant degree. MMP-2 and COX-2 might play a synergetic role in the carcinogenesis of bladder transitional cell carcinoma.