ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology applied in thyroid surgery to identify parathyroid gland.Methods:From Oct 2021 to May 2022, data of 42 patients undergoing thyroidectomy via gasless unilateral axillary approach in Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Cases using intraoperative fluorescence imaging technology(42 cases) were compared with conventional laparocopic approach.Results:The number of parathyroid glands dissected in the study group 1.57±0.61 was higher than that in the control group 0.56± 0.59 ( t=-5.472, P<0.05). The PTH value of the study group was (2.88±1.23)pmol/L on the first day after operation, which was higher than that of the control group (2.16±0.10)pmol/L ( t=-1.844, P<0.05). The blood parathyroid hormone value on the third day(3.22±1.31)pmol/L was higher than that of the control group (2.55±0.81) pmol/L ( t=-2.041, P<0.05). There were 2 cases of hypoparathyroidism in the study group, less than 5 cases in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups( χ2=0.942, P>0.05). There was 1 case of hypocalcemia in the study group and 3 cases in the control group ( χ2=0.731, P>0.05). Conclusion:Using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology to identify parathyroid gland is feasible, simple, fast, safe and effective.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the 2496 biological samples collected from 1574 larceny cases and improve the application of DNA in the larceny cases. Methods Make a summary of the biological samples collection methods and DNA test results in different type of larceny cases. Results Touch samples have already become the most common type of biological samples in larceny cases, but their DNA test success rate are still low, more work should be done for the DNA mixed type to improve DNA hit. The DNA positive result rate had statistical difference in biological samples with different collection methods. For the Touch samples, flocked swab and original are the best collection methods. Conclusion More Valuable biological samples collected by the crime scene investigators are the Key factor in improvement of DNA detection capability, awareness of trace biological evidence and the touch sample collection technique are very important for the crime scene investigators.
ABSTRACT
There is increasing recognition of the importance of the quality of life (QOL) since it became an endpoint of clinical practices, a variety of disease-specific quality of life instruments have been developed and used as a means of assessing clinical interventions. Traditional evaluation was performed by researchers who generally ignore the subjective feeling from pa-tiens. At present, many evaluation criteria has paid more attention to the patient's subjective feelings into the scoring system, the assessment tool of patient-reported outcome (PRO) is usually the patient self-rating scale or questionnaire. As a common complica-tions of terminal stages of cancer, the treatment of bone metastases is usually conservative, improving or maintaining the quality of life of patients has been the consensus. Bone metastases trials have employed QLQ-C30 which raised by Europe Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) or other generic health related QOL measurement, such as functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and the MOS 36-item short from health survey (SF-36). But they lack specificity and accuracy in the assessment. EORTC QLQ-BM22 scale is considered as a bone metastases specific scale which was introducted in 2009, after the reliability, validity, cross-cultural adaptability verification, with the combination of EORTC QLQ-C 30 or used alone, has in-creasingly applied to clinical trials and practice for QOL assessment of bone metastatic cancer patients in recent years. It complete the EORTC evaluation system, which has significant value for assessing efficacy. EORTC QLQ-BM 22 has been translated into sim-plified Chinese and evaluated its utility, could be used in China as an effective questionnaire in evaluating the QOL for patients with bone metastases. In this study, current situation and progress of QOL measuring tools for bone metastases patients is re-viewed, in order to help researchers choose appropriate scale and better assess the efficacy, find the pros and cons to guide the clinical treatment decision.
ABSTRACT
There is increasing recognition of the importance of the quality of life (QOL) since it became an endpoint of clinical practices, a variety of disease-specific quality of life instruments have been developed and used as a means of assessing clinical interventions. Traditional evaluation was performed by researchers who generally ignore the subjective feeling from pa-tiens. At present, many evaluation criteria has paid more attention to the patient's subjective feelings into the scoring system, the assessment tool of patient-reported outcome (PRO) is usually the patient self-rating scale or questionnaire. As a common complica-tions of terminal stages of cancer, the treatment of bone metastases is usually conservative, improving or maintaining the quality of life of patients has been the consensus. Bone metastases trials have employed QLQ-C30 which raised by Europe Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) or other generic health related QOL measurement, such as functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and the MOS 36-item short from health survey (SF-36). But they lack specificity and accuracy in the assessment. EORTC QLQ-BM22 scale is considered as a bone metastases specific scale which was introducted in 2009, after the reliability, validity, cross-cultural adaptability verification, with the combination of EORTC QLQ-C 30 or used alone, has in-creasingly applied to clinical trials and practice for QOL assessment of bone metastatic cancer patients in recent years. It complete the EORTC evaluation system, which has significant value for assessing efficacy. EORTC QLQ-BM 22 has been translated into sim-plified Chinese and evaluated its utility, could be used in China as an effective questionnaire in evaluating the QOL for patients with bone metastases. In this study, current situation and progress of QOL measuring tools for bone metastases patients is re-viewed, in order to help researchers choose appropriate scale and better assess the efficacy, find the pros and cons to guide the clinical treatment decision.