ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with osteoporosis. METHODS: Eighty patients with LSS combined with osteoporosis were divided into a control and PTED group, which received conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and PTED, respectively. The surgical indications, incision visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar and leg pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, bone mineral density (BMD), and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the operation time, bleeding loss and hospitalization duration, incision VAS scores at postoperative 12, 24 and 48 h and lumbar and leg pain VAS and lumbar ODI scores on postoperative 6 months were significantly decreased (P < 0.01), and the lumbar JOA score on postoperative 6 months was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BMD between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the total effective rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTED is safe and effective in the treatment of LSS combined with osteoporosis.
RESUMO: OBJETIVO: Investigar a eficácia e segurança da discectomia endoscópica percutânea transforaminal (DEPT) no tratamento da estenose lombar (EL) combinada à osteoporose. MÉTODOS: Oitenta pacientes com EL combinada à osteoporose foram divididos entre um grupo de controle e um grupo de DEPT, que receberam tratamento convencional com fusão intersomática lombar transforaminal e DEPT, respectivamente. As indicações cirúrgicas, a escala analógica visual (VAS) da incisão e de dor lombar e nas pernas, os escores lombares de acordo com a Associação Ortopédica Japonesa (JOA) e o Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a densidade mineral óssea (DMO) e possíveis reações adversas foram observados. RESULTADOS: Em comparação com o grupo de controle, no grupo de DEPT o tempo de operação, a perda de sangue e duração de internação, os escores VAS da incisão no pós-operatório após 12, 24 e 48 h, o VAS para dor lombar e nas pernas e os escores ODI lombares após 6 meses de pós-operatório foram significativamente menores (P < 0,01); já o escore JOA lombar após 6 meses de pós-operatório foi significativamente maior (P < 0,05). Não houve diferença significativa na densidade mineral óssea entre os dois grupos (P > 0,05). Em comparação com o grupo de controle, o grupo de DEPT teve uma taxa efetiva total significativamente maior (P < 0,05), e a incidência de reações adversas foi significativamente menor (P < 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: A discectomia endoscópica percutânea transforaminal é segura e eficaz no tratamento de EL combinada à osteoporose.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Osteoporosis/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Osteoporosis/complications , Postoperative Care , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Time Factors , Bone Density , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/standards , Disability Evaluation , Visual Analog Scale , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (BF%) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) in assessing obesity among college students.@*Methods@#BMI, BF% and WHR of 1 263 college students from one university were assessed by using bioelectrical impedance method.@*Results@#The detection rate of obesity by BMI, BF% and WHR methods was 2.06%, 24.31% and 14.09%. Prevalence of obesity by BF% method was higher than WHR method(χ2=264.27, P<0.05). Prevalence of obesity by BMI method was significantly higher in boys (4.74%) than in girls (0.50%), however, it was higher in girls than in boys by using BF% and WHR method(χ2=75.69，215.99，27.73，P<0.05). The consistency analysis showed that the kappa values of BF% method and gold standard BMI method was(0.11±0.02)(P<0.05), and that of WHR method and gold standard BMI method was(0.17±0.04)(P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#The consistency of BMI, BF% and WHR in determining obesity among college students is quite low. It is suggested that comprehensive consideration should be taken in practical application to effectively screen and prevent obesity among college students.