Treatment experience of severe acute pancreatitis on 1033 cases / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To summary the treatment experience of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 1997 to March 2009, a total of 1033 patients suffered SAP were admitted with a mean APACHE II score 12.0 +/- 4.3. There were 622 males and 411 females, aged from 13 to 98 years old. All patients were cared by the multidisciplinary team with intensivist, endoscopists, gastroenterologists, radiologist, nephrologist and surgeons.Patients treated in SICU in the early phase of the disease. In these 1033 patients, 365 cases received mechanical ventilation, 218 with tracheotomy, 159 cases received high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), 179 received nasobiliary drainage, 513 were treated with early enteral nutrition. CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainge for peripancreatic fluid collection was pefromed for 477 times and 438 patients received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In all these 1033 cases, 975 patients (94.4%) survived, and 38 patients died (3.7%). The mortality of patients who received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis was 7.1% (31/438).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The muti-discipline management of severe acute pancreatitis can remarkably improve the prognosis of patients.</p>

Effects of glutamine granules on immunofunction in trauma patients: a double-blind randomized controlled, multi-center clinical trail with 120 patients / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the effect of glutamine granules on immunofunction in severe burns and trauma patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and twenty patients with severe burns, multiple trauma and post operation who met the requirements of the protocol joined this double-blind randomized controlled, multi-center clinical trail. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: placebo control group (P group, 60 patients) and glutamine granules treatment group (GLN group, 60 patients). There was isonitrogenous and isocaloric intake in both groups. GLN and P group patients had been given glutamine granules or placebo (glycine) at 0.5 g.kg(-1).d(-1) for 7 days, respectively. The level of plasma glutamine and some index of immunofunction were determined, and the complication and side effect were also observed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>After 7 days of taking glutamine granules orally, plasma GLN concentration was significantly higher than that in P group [(593 +/- 185) micromol/L vs (407 +/- 190) micromol/L)] (P < 0.01). IL-2 level, CD(4)/CD(8) ratio, PMN swallow ratio in GLN group were significantly higher than those in P group (P < 0.05-0.01), but the concentration of IgG, IgM, C(3)/C(4) were not significantly different when compared with P group (P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrence of side effect in both groups was seldom.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Taking glutamine granules could increase plasma GLN concentration, enhance body immunofunction, and using glutamine granules is safe.</p>

Effects of glutamine granules on protein metabolism in trauma patients / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the effect of glutamine granules on protein metabolism in severe burns and trauma patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>120 patients with severe burns, multiple trauma and post operation who met the requirements of the protocol joined this double-blind randomized controlled, multi-center clinical trail. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: placebo control group (P group, 60 patients) and glutamine granules treatment group (GLN group, 60 patients). There was isonitrogenous and isocaloric intake in both groups, GLN and P group patents had been given glutamine granules or placebo (glycine) at 0.5 g.kg(-1).d(-1) for 7 days, respectively. The level of plasma glutamine, protein and urine nitrogen exclude were determined, wound healing rate of burn area and hospital stay were recorded, and then observed the complication and side effect.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>After 7 days of taking glutamine granules orally, plasma GLN concentration was significant higher than that in P group (592.50 +/- 185.23 micro mol/L vs. 407.41 +/- 190.22 micro mol/L) (P < 0.01). Plasma prealbumin and transferrin in GLN group were significant higher than those in P group (P < 0.01), but the concentration of total protein and albumin were no marked changes compare with P group (P > 0.05). The capacity of urine nitrogen exclude in GLN group were significant lower than that in P group. Additional, the wound healing rate was faster and hospital stay days was shorter than P group (P < 0.05), and the occurrence of glutamine granules side effect was seldom.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Taking glutamine could promote protein synthesis, abate protein decompose, ameliorate wound healing rate and reduce hospital stay obviously.</p>

Analysis of the therapeutic effect and the safety of glutamine granules per os in patients with severe burns and trauma / 中华烧伤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the therapeutic effect and possible side effects of glutamine granules per os in patients with trauma, burns and major operations.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Patients inflicted with severe burns, trauma and major operations were enrolled in the study. One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into two groups, 60 in control group (C) and 60 in glutamine group (Gln). Randomized double blind and placebo control methods were employed in the study. All the patients in both groups were given diet with equal calories and equal nitrogen content. The patients in Gln group received glutamine granules in dose of 0.5 g.kg(-1).d(-1) orally or by gavage, while those in C group received same dose of placebo (glycine) for 7 days. The changes in the intestinal mucosal barrier function, the protein metabolism, the immune function, hepatic and renal functions, and the incidence of side effects of the medication in both groups of patients were observed and compared before and after the supplementation of glutamine or glycine.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The plasma contents of glutamine, proteins and interleukin 2 in both groups were all lower than normal values. But the plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) activity, endotoxin content, intestinal mucosal permeability (urine lactose/mannitol, L/M) and urine excretion of nitrogen increased obviously in both groups. The plasma glutamine concentration in Gln group increased by 38.04% after the administration of Gln for 7 days (P < 0.01). The plasma contents of pro-albumin, transferrin, and IL-2 were obviously higher than those in the C group (the increase rates were 21.19%, 51.11%, 57.54%, respectively, P < 0.01). The plasma DAO activity, L/M ratio, endotoxin content and urine nitrogen excretion in Gln group were evidently lower than those in C group (the decrease rates were 47.26%, 52.18, 22.22% and 27.78%, respectively, P < 0.05 or 0.01). There was no obvious difference in the plasma levels of total protein and albumin, the indices in blood and urine test, or the hepatic and renal functions between the two groups before and after the amino acid supplementation. Mild side effects such as nausea, diarrhea, constipation occurred in both groups, but all of them disappeared spontaneously afterwards (P > 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Oral administration of glutamine could be helpful to increase plasma concentration of glutamine and to ameliorate obviously the intestinal mucosal injury, to promote systemic protein synthesis and to inhibit protein catabolism and to upgrade systemic immune function with little side effect in patients with severe injury.</p>

Albumin kinetics in patients with severe sepsis / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the mechanism of hypoalbuminemia in patients with severe sepsis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>I(125)-labeled albumin was administered intravenously to 10 health volunteers and 10 patients with severe sepsis. Blood samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 22, 25 days for the measurement of the dose of gamma-radiation and the curve of concentration and time. Then the half-life time (t(1/2)), apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) and transportation rate (K(12)) from center compartment to side compartment of albumin were calculated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The half-life time in septic group was obviously shorter than that in control group (8.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 12.5 +/- 1.7, P < 0.01). The transportation rate in the septic group was higher than that in the control group [(4.4 +/- 1.9) x 10(-2)/h vs. (2.4 +/- 0.6) x 10(-2)/h, P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in apparent volume of distribution between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>In patients with severe sepsis, the distribution rate of albumin from vessel to tissue was obviously increased and the decomposition rate of albumin was markedly improved.</p>