ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the influence of automatic and semi-automatic hemodialyzer reuse method on hemodialyzer reuse effect. Methods 1728 dialyzers were randomly divided into automatichemodialyzer reuse group and semi- automatic hemodialyzer reuse group with 864 dialyzers in each group. Thetime of douching and testing, the cost of sterilization,the frequency of the pyrphgen reaction,the broken dialyzer membrane and re-examined dialyzer between the two groups were measured. Results The time of douching dialyzer, testing of total cell volume and pressure in the semi- automatic hemodialyzer reuse group was (26.443±3.237), (2.172±0.128) and (2.157±0.090) minutes respectively,while the automatic hemodialyzer reuse group was (5.793±0.193), (1.257±0.118) and (1.110±0.076) minutes respectively. The frequency of re-examined dialyzer in testing total cell volume and pressure was 499(57.755%), 243(28.125%) respectively. At the same time, all dialyzer in semi-automatic hemodialyzer reuse group could be examined successfully at a time. The cost of sterilization in automatic henmdialyzer reuse group was (9.330±0.138)yuan. No pyrogen reaction and broken dialyzer membrane happened. Conclusions The semi-automatic bemodialyzer reuse group can retrench cost during perfusion,but consumes long douching time, lacks matching detection equipment, difficult to detect, and is not easy to read data and has high re- examination rate. while in the automatic hemodialyzer group, it is convenient of douching and detection, but the cost of sterilization and equipment is high, and clinical demand can be fulfilled only when the dialysis center can allocate reasonable number of the machines.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the influence of different testing methods on detecting value of to-tal cell volume. Methods 60 reusable dialyzers(low-flux dialyzer and high-flux dialyzer were 30 respec-tively) were enrolled. They were divided into the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group with 20 dialyzers in each group according to different detecting methods, the results underwent analysis. Results The basic total cell volume of the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group were (100.10±0.25) ml, (100.13±0.50) ml and (102.00±1.41) ml in 6LR dialyzer, while in 17R dialyzer, they were (113.67±1.30) ml, (118.67±1.30) ml and (119.93±1.77)ml respectively. The total cell volume of the dialyzer reuse in the traditional testing group, the modified testing group and the automatic dialyzer reuse group were (95.20±7.76) ml, (96.20± 7.22) ml and (102.80±4.26) ml in 6LR dialyzer, while in 17R dialyzer, they were (100.00±11.48) ml, (114.35±3.31 ) ml and (117.07±2.96) ml respectively. There was significant difference between the tradi-tional and the modified testing groups in high-flux dialyzers reuse. Conclusions The modified testing method can improve the accuracy of the testing of total cell volume in high-flux dialyzer reuse.