ABSTRACT
Objective To study the willingness and influence factors related to "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy,among the household chefs,and provide reference for government to adjust and optimize the strategy on avian influenza prevention.Methods According to the geographical characteristics and regional functions,6'monitoring stations' were selected from 12 residential districts of Guangzhou,respectively.Another 21 meat markets which selling live poultry,were selected in each station and 5 household chefs of each market were invited to attend a face to face interview.Basic information,personal cognitive,willingness and influencing factors to the policy were under study.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods were used.Results A total of 664 household chefs underwent the survey and results showed that the rate of support to the "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy was 44.6％ (296/664).Results from the multi-factor logistic regression showed that those household chefs who were males (OR=1.618,95％ CI:1.156-2.264,P=0.005),having received higher education (OR=1.814,95％ CI:1.296-2.539,P=0.001),or believing that the existence of live poultry stalls was related to the transmission of avian influenza (OR=1.918,95％CI:1.341-2.743,P＜0.001) were factors at higher risk.These household chefs also intended to avoid the use of live poultry stalls (OR =1.666,95％CI:1.203-2.309,P=0.002) and accept the "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy.Conclusion Detailed study on this subject and,setting up pilot project in some areas as well as prioritizing the education programs for household chefs seemed helpful to the implementation of the'freezing-fresh poultry'policy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the willingness and influence factors related to "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy,among the household chefs,and provide reference for government to adjust and optimize the strategy on avian influenza prevention.Methods According to the geographical characteristics and regional functions,6'monitoring stations' were selected from 12 residential districts of Guangzhou,respectively.Another 21 meat markets which selling live poultry,were selected in each station and 5 household chefs of each market were invited to attend a face to face interview.Basic information,personal cognitive,willingness and influencing factors to the policy were under study.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods were used.Results A total of 664 household chefs underwent the survey and results showed that the rate of support to the "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy was 44.6％ (296/664).Results from the multi-factor logistic regression showed that those household chefs who were males (OR=1.618,95％ CI:1.156-2.264,P=0.005),having received higher education (OR=1.814,95％ CI:1.296-2.539,P=0.001),or believing that the existence of live poultry stalls was related to the transmission of avian influenza (OR=1.918,95％CI:1.341-2.743,P＜0.001) were factors at higher risk.These household chefs also intended to avoid the use of live poultry stalls (OR =1.666,95％CI:1.203-2.309,P=0.002) and accept the "centralized slaughtering,fresh poultry listing and marketing" strategy.Conclusion Detailed study on this subject and,setting up pilot project in some areas as well as prioritizing the education programs for household chefs seemed helpful to the implementation of the'freezing-fresh poultry'policy.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the results of nine-round environmental specimen surveillance programs in five live poultry markets pre-, during and post the 'closing days' and to evaluate the effects of 'closing days' on live poultry markets regarding the control against avian influenza pollution.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>In January 2014, control measures including culling poultry, completely cleaning and disinfecting and a 'three-day-closing' measure were conducted in five live poultry markets which were found positive for H7N9 nucleic acid in the 1(st) round environmental specimen surveillance program. Second surveillance program was conducted after a thorough disinfection campaign was launched. Several times surveillance were conducted in one week, after the markets were reopened. RT-PCR was used to test the nucleic acid of HA, H5, H7 and H9 viruses.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>654 specimens from the environment were collected and tested. During the first round surveillance program, positive rates for influenza A and H5/H7/H9 nucleic acid of poultry stalls appeared to be 94.44% and 61.11% respectively. The positive rates of poultry stalls reduced to 0 after the disinfection campaign but increased again after the markets reopened. The positive rate for influenza A of poultry stalls slightly increased from 50.00% in the third surveillance to 72.22% in the ninth surveillance (P > 0.05). The positive rate for H5/H7/H9 of poultry stalls showed a significantly increasing trend, from 0 in the third surveillance to 44.44% in the ninth surveillance (P < 0.01). The positive rates for influenza A and H5/H7/H9 nucleic acid of specimens were 28.89% and 17.78% respectively. The positive rate of specimens reduced to 0 after disinfection while increased again after reopening of the markets. The positive rate for influenza A of specimens slightly increased from 19.67% in the third surveillance to 27.54% in the ninth surveillance programs (P > 0.05). The positive rate for H5/H7/H9 of specimen showed a significant increasing trend, from 0 in the third surveillance to 8.70% in the ninth-round surveillance programs (P < 0.01). The positive rate for influenza A was the highest for slaughter- related specimens of 22.4% (35/156). The positive rates for influenza A from sewage and drinking water being collected on the later stage after the markets reopened (25.9%, 12.4%)were higher than those on the early stage (8.3%, 8.6%) (P > 0.05). The positive rate for influenza A of poultry stalls with overnight poultry storage (91.7%) was significant higher than that of poultry stalls without the overnight storage (33.3%). The positive rate for influenza A of poultry stalls in which simultaneously selling different kinds of poultry (85.7%) was significant higher than that of poultry stalls in which selling only one kind of poultry at one time (25.0%) (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Slaughter in live poultry markets posed a large risk of pollution diffusion. Sewage and drinking water showed an accumulation effect for avian influenza virus. Overnight poultry storage and selling different kinds of poultry at one time at the poultry stalls seemed the risk factors for avian influenza virus transmission. Complete cleaning, disinfecting and several 'closing days' for live poultry markets seemed effective in eliminating avian influenza virus. Once the markets were reopened, they seemed to be soon polluted again.</p>